Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/SZ64KKS3E6UMTNVZSN7LOLBF2BKVX3RC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "SZ64KKS3E6UMTNVZSN7LOLBF2BKVX3RC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CPG4R3I5X3GMO3WRCYAHC6H334DOLLYI/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "starlight04 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "MKM",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Putting The Cart Before The Horse",
    "date": "2007-12-13T22:24:22Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CPG4R3I5X3GMO3WRCYAHC6H334DOLLYI/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Thank you for the time you take to express your views.\nThis is EXACTLY what we need!\n\n\nOn Dec 13, 2007, at 12:49 AM, Fred A Parker wrote:\n\n> First in my original post I wanted to stimulate a debate on the  \n> feasibility of Phase 4.   I received to many e-mail's off line to  \n> count all afraid to say anything on the bb.   Everyone supporting  \n> my opinion not one negative, thank you all for the support.   I did  \n> also receive emails from Rick Hambly and Robert McGuire attesting  \n> to my lack of intellectual capacity.  (attack the messenger not the  \n> message) In his Email to me Mr. McQwier also challenged me to  \n> submit a resolution to the BOD and he would second it.   My plans  \n> are to take him up on it.   I actually plan on submitting two off  \n> them.\n>\n>    First:  To form a committee of amateurs in and out of Amsat with  \n> technical skills to asses the viability of SDR.   The number one  \n> reason for this is after three years I have not been able to find  \n> one instance where anyone has produced a working SDR transponder.    \n> Second:   One night recently while talking on two meter ssb to a  \n> local retired ham, a retired collage professor with a PHD.    Who  \n> rights his own SDR software.   When explaining what Amsat was  \n> trying to do his words were good luck.   If this SDR is such a good  \n> thing those behind it should welcome a full per review and prove me  \n> wrong.\n>\n>     Second:   To form a committee of hams to survey hams both in  \n> and out of Amsat on what they want in a future satellite.    With  \n> the goal of bringing in new hams for increasing membership in Amsat.\n>\n> This is my opinion and I feel free to express it because over the  \n> last three years I have donated at least $30,000.00 US dollars in  \n> CNC Machine shop work to Amsat. Especially to the Eagle project.    \n> As I see it now the project actually has gone backward.  How would  \n> you feel if you spent a whole winter working on the Eagle Module's  \n> pro bono and just because you did not agree with something that  \n> your intelligence would be attacked.   I just got off Eagle Pedia  \n> and could not find updated mechanical drawings as the old design  \n> has been scrapped.   I want again to state this is my opinion.   It  \n> is my believe that Rick Hambly and his phase 4 are just a diversion  \n> to cover up his past failures with the hardware and software for  \n> present projects.   How does Amsat realistically plan on paying for  \n> such a project that when I confronted him via email that he did not  \n> deny would cost a minimum of $5 million dollars.  As for the rest,  \n> it is being covered pretty well on this bb.\n>\n> Fred\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}