Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T2GWU577QPKW5KPSZL4HQSFFMFZLZAFM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "T2GWU577QPKW5KPSZL4HQSFFMFZLZAFM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2Y6CZ62SYDFJAHIA5OA4JVPZSZAEMHZK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kf4otn (a) ericsatcom.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Eric Christensen",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: ISS Not A Satellite  WAS: Satellites and the LoTW",
    "date": "2007-01-27T19:22:48Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FNWUEGCFCWSGD56YTRCTSBPBUBICRSQP/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I got curious and looked on the ARRL website and found the criteria for\nDXCC entities (http://www.arrl.org/awards/dxcc/rules.html#siii).  I\nthink it is definitely doable but I don't really know who to contact\n(maybe [email protected]?).\n\nI wonder how one would get a card from the ISS?  It appears that the\nARRL is the US QSL Manager (http://www.rac.ca/ariss/oindex.htm#QSL's) so\nit should be feasible to have all the contacts go into the LoTW without\nany problem as well as getting a hard card.\n\nDo you want to try to petition the ARRL to make the ISS a DXCC entity?\nI'll be happy to co-support the idea.\n\n73s,\nEric KF4OTN\n\n\nCathryn Mataga wrote:\n>  >ARRL should recognize the ISS as a country. That would\n>>> stir up the pot.  If Scarborough reef is a country, then why can't\n>>> the ISS be a country? \n>>>     \n>> You mean s DXCC Entity not a country - DXCC Entities are artificial creations\n>> that have nothing to do with countries, that's why there are 200 more DXCC\n>> Entities than countries.\n>>   \n> \n> \n> Yeah, DXCC entity,   It would have to be done carefully in order to prevent\n> DX-crazy hams from hounding the astronauts off the band.   But if \n> someone wanted\n> to pay the Russians the X-million dollars to go up there to operate a \n> DX-pedition,\n> this would be keeping with the spirit of DXCC I believe.   Seems to me the\n> international nature of the space station gives it kind of  'DXCC \n> entity-like'\n> nature, however the specific rules are lawyered.\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}