Email Detail

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T2HMYZIPYWR6URAM7S6JF4PAQOTHAMQW/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T2HMYZIPYWR6URAM7S6JF4PAQOTHAMQW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CADWh2KpF97VQz5kue-NoihL1EUtnO=O8S=9=Q03Vioua9qn5Dg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "T2HMYZIPYWR6URAM7S6JF4PAQOTHAMQW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/B3CEGWWUY3RYRDNN4O3MGLEAWVJS54FQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kd7lee (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "8202095e9bac4f66b43cc1f26a2a36a5",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8202095e9bac4f66b43cc1f26a2a36a5/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Daniel Wight",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Unsuccessful Uplinks - AO-92",
    "date": "2018-06-07T06:08:01Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6M6TPKC4L6RL4GDJUBXC7FIHRF7IQ7KS/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/JQBUPQEZ6E6HZ6E7A6TCB7JMV3HDPXV4/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "As Gabe pointed out, I may have this backwards as I started out on SO-50\n(V/U) & then applied my original techniques to the Fox (U/V) birds in error\n(i.e. your initial settings are probably correct). I need to do some more\nresearch before I understand this fully, but it looks like I've been using\nthe wrong uplink frequencies on my IC-W32A. My apologies for the mistake.\nLooks like I'll be reprogramming my radio soon....\n\n73,\n\nDaniel, KD7LEE\n\nOn Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:50 Hugo Dominguez, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Thanks. All the web pages I read said to perform doppler shift by starting\n> 10 kHz below and work your way up. Even this amsat website has instructions\n> to do it how I am doing it:\n> https://amsat-uk.org/2018/01/26/ao-92-open-for-amateur-radio-use/\n>\n> I also just noticed that there is a schedule for the L-band for uplink\n> which i’m interpreting that UHF won’t work when the bird is setup for the\n> L-band for uplink. Maybe I was trying to make contact when it was on the L\n> band.\n>\n> —\n> Hugo Dominguez, Jr.\n>\n> On Jun 6, 2018, at 21:07, Daniel Wight <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> Seems like your Doppler shift might be opposite. I normally start high &\n> work my way down during the satellite pass... (For instance, I would start\n> at 435.180 for AO-85 and then work my way down to 435.160 as the satellite\n> 'sunsets' on my horizon). Doppler shift should be higher frequency during\n> approach, near zero when the satellite is overhead, and lower after the\n> satellite passes.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Daniel, KD7LEE\n>\n> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 17:27 Andrew Glasbrenner <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n>\n>> You've discovered one of the reasons full duplex is best on the FM\n>> sats...you have no idea if you are getting through, because you can't hear\n>> while transmitting.\n>>\n>> Got another radio so you can work full duplex?\n>>\n>> 73, Drew KO4MA\n>>\n>> -----Original Message-----\n>> From: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Hugo Dominguez,\n>> Jr.\n>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 7:41 PM\n>> To: [email protected]\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Unsuccessful Uplinks - AO-92\n>>\n>> I’ve just started playing with talking on satellites. I’m able to hear\n>> all the satellites (AO-85, AO-91, AO-92 and SO-50) that I have programmed\n>> on my Kenwood TH-D74, which I use with my Elk dual band periodic log\n>> antenna. However no one can hear me or responds to me. I’ve only been\n>> successful with my uplink (being heard) on AO-91 on several passes. I\n>> triple checked my frequencies on my radio and the 67 Hz tone and they are\n>> set as follows:\n>> Sat.        Xmit       Tone\n>> SO-50   145.850  67.0 Hz\n>> AO-85   435.170  67.0 Hz\n>> AO-91   435.250  67.0 HZ\n>> AO-92   435.350  67.0 Hz\n>> These are the frequencies used when the bird is at its peak. I adjust for\n>> doppler on 440 by starting out 10 khz less, e.g AO-85 435.160, 435.165,\n>> 435.170, 435.175, 435.180.\n>>\n>> Any ideas if something has changed from what is published or am I missing\n>> something? Like I said, i’ve been able to communicate on AO-91.\n>>\n>> —\n>> Hugo Dominguez, Jr.\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to\n>> all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n>> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official\n>> views of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>> Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>> AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}