Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T5D3WK4CMLDO5HA6Y6P4ETMEPDZKWT4B/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T5D3WK4CMLDO5HA6Y6P4ETMEPDZKWT4B/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "T5D3WK4CMLDO5HA6Y6P4ETMEPDZKWT4B",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/5FSCW5IGL5YCVKPYXD3HQPICGYMV3WDQ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: DSP Speaker",
    "date": "2007-04-12T03:50:09Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OXOLSMVS6EDK7VCGTUBXCSO2EC637IDG/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7C4CLAQJF3O2IBV3VAF27U5GFU4O4KCK/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2HKFMTDNJVHG2QAPY4OIN5VXPH6B5A5Y/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 12:04 PM 4/12/2007, Roger Kolakowski wrote:\n>And the winning answer was....?\n\nThat one's got me curious too.  I'm particularly fussy about DSP \nnoise reduction, and there are very few that I actually like.  The \none I use is made by Michels Engineering in Germany, which provides \nan excellent degree of noise reduction and doesn't distort the audio \nas severely as many others.  For me, that distortion interferes with \nmy ability to pull a signal out of the mud, and most of the DSP noise \nreductions work best for me in the \"off\" position, as far as \nreadability goes.  The Michaels one, OTOH, has no impact on \nreadability at worst, and often a modest improvement, as well as \nexcellent noise reduction.  On very weak FM signals (ideal for SO-50 \n:) ), the readability is dramatically improved, and the DSP can \nalmost act as an FM voice activated mute.\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}