Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T5SOKTARKEUTHCHTXP4CKISB6ILVICHK/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T5SOKTARKEUTHCHTXP4CKISB6ILVICHK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "T5SOKTARKEUTHCHTXP4CKISB6ILVICHK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RYXJFGNEZQZYI7PQVJENGNUZJGP7T5QV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kd7yz (a) denstarfarm.us",
        "mailman_id": "60d912306f0c4bda8adf7b05d0831c94",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/60d912306f0c4bda8adf7b05d0831c94/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob KD7YZ",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Minimum 10m equipment for NO-84?",
    "date": "2015-11-26T12:19:50Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RYXJFGNEZQZYI7PQVJENGNUZJGP7T5QV/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 25-Nov-15 2345, Scott wrote:\n\n... just what would be required to transmit PSK-31 to\n> NO-84?\n\nPer WB4APR, I got the program \"PSKDoppler\". That one drives my\nTigertronics-SignaLink with the data to Drive the K3. The K3 goes to the\nweak-link, namely my 300-foot dipole, ladder-line-fed at 85 feet.\n\nThe antenna pattern just isn't too useful for continuous access, in a\ngiven pass,  to PSAT.\n\nThe program DopplerPSK on the other hand is nifty. Keeps the TX freq\nquite stable to the uplink. Since the Downlink on 70cm is FM, I don't\nseem to have to worry about Doppler corrections on that downlink. Pretty\nneat indeed.\n\nThe difficulties I have are in not being strong enough, often with 90\nwatts, to bring-up PSAT. If the downlink is activated by her beacon,\nthen I get in quite well.\n\nIn my case I need a vertical for 10m.\n\nThis all may not be your minimal requirement. However, you can see what\nanother newbie to PSAT is trying.\n\n\n\n> In the Amateur Radio world, I'm sure that I'm in the minority, but I\n> don't even OWN an HF rig. \n\nA comment here. As a T-Shirt which I bought for my grand-daughter says,\n\"When All Else Fails ... Amateur Radio.\" IIRC, Sparks has a Key and wire\nantenna on that \"T\".\n\nHF is useful to reach planet-wide in emergencies of a larger scale. With\ntoday's digital modes like JT65, I have made VK on a half-watt. ..The\nneed for good CW is, to me, self-explanatory. In '58 when I started CW\nwas better than my nose touching the SHure-Mic and getting zapped all\nthe dang time. CW should be a skill set required. And mechanical CW, not\na digital representation.\n\nThis is Thanksgiving, please don't carpet-bomb me for the last\nparagraph, hi hi.\n\nHappy THANKSGIVING fellow Satellite-People.\n\n\n> My primary interests are the higher ....\n\nyes, mine too. But not all-inclusive\n\n\n-- \n73,\nBob KD7YZ\nwww.qrz.com/db/kd7yz\nAmSat LM#901\n",
    "attachments": []
}