Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TBKGUKJNMODBTEMJN2FP6BDFZ5OIUXTO/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "20081207041811.FEVN29639.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@Dave05Compaq.san.rr.com",
    "message_id_hash": "TBKGUKJNMODBTEMJN2FP6BDFZ5OIUXTO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/ZNQFJO3V5OF4MN7G5D3WQ672KO3QDL5W/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dguimon1 (a) san.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Guimont",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: K5OE antenna projects",
    "date": "2008-12-07T04:18:08Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HWA3AAVHMVOBVB4S4XZIWOFLY4PI5SBW/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nHi Alan,\n\nI designed and built a quadfilar described at:\n\nhttp://home.san.rr.com/doguimont/uploads\n\nas quadfil1.zip\n\nAnd it proved superior to an eggbeater...My \nmethod of testing comparatively, is quite \nsimple,  I did coax switching, and made an \nimmediate comparison by listening on a hamsat...\n\nMy old tired ears did the evaluation..\n\nI use a 435 and 2 meter version, mounted on a \nfixed 40° EL, and rotate with an inexpensive TV rotor...\n\nThe coax connectors are the most expensive part \nof the antenna, and of course use type N's at \n435, best to use them at 2 meters.\n\nMount them both vertically, and you will get good \nresults at all ELs above 30°..........\n\n\n\n\n\n            73, Dave, WB6LLO\n                [email protected]\n\n                    Disagree: I learn....\n\n               Pulling for P3E... \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}