Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TC4U44MA3W6BG5ZRHTAJ3DFUDCFQG6WM/
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TC4U44MA3W6BG5ZRHTAJ3DFUDCFQG6WM/", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "TC4U44MA3W6BG5ZRHTAJ3DFUDCFQG6WM", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GOQOYN645SHOTUUHHBDT3MNHIVIDMUZX/", "sender": { "address": "karl (a) bullock.org", "mailman_id": "7fec50a7b2bd468890d902c1d56561f5", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/7fec50a7b2bd468890d902c1d56561f5/emails/" }, "sender_name": "Karl Bullock", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Redundant geostaionary birds?", "date": "2007-01-30T18:14:58Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KIWHRYFAP2QENQUTM3MNMSXFURXNCWNG/", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Thanks, Dave. Nothing ventured, nothing gained, eh?\n\n73,\nKarl, WA5TMC\n\nDave hartzell wrote:\n> Hi Ed,\n>\n> You're right, the thread is going nowhere, other than to satisfy some\n> intellectual curiosity. That was established early on in the thread.\n>\n> Why not explore potential systems and alternatives, even if they are a dead-end?\n>\n> Thanks for contributing! ;-)\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Dave\n>\n> On 1/30/07, Edward R. Cole <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>> Dave and all:\n>>\n>> I wonder what all of you were thinking? If a commercial communication\n>> satellite were channeled on one of our mw ham bands, then we would be\n>> booted off.\n>>\n>> C-band satellites used approx. 37-MHz wide channels with alternating linear\n>> polarity to afford more adjacent channel isolation. On most of the TVRO\n>> units one could manually adjust polarization angle for optimizing the\n>> signal. If you adjusted 90-degrees off then one often got a ghost of one\n>> of the adjacent channels. The feedhorns had a rotating probe with the\n>> motor on the backside of the feedhorn.\n>>\n>> Typically in the mid-1980's these TV sats cost over $100M before launch.\n>> Your not going to convince the satellite company to include ham radio in\n>> any manner.\n>> AS has been hashed out many times previous on this reflector the path loss\n>> to the Clarke Belt orbit is prohibitive.\n>>\n>> This topic is going no-where!\n>>\n>> 73, Ed - KL7UW\n>>\n>> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n>\n> \n", "attachments": [] }