Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TCJLTHTDOSMI7LURHHDERGOOL6UBKK77/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TCJLTHTDOSMI7LURHHDERGOOL6UBKK77/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "TCJLTHTDOSMI7LURHHDERGOOL6UBKK77", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6WKYVCFHWKTMVFBPJJFIT7MBE4TW3FT2/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "nsp25 (a) cornell.edu", "mailman_id": "013b724c0f5242a785b441fc3ae1038c", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/013b724c0f5242a785b441fc3ae1038c/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Nathaniel S. Parsons", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: BeeSat at 4800 GMSK", "date": "2010-04-11T05:01:40Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VT7DZDXGDC6GNIHHU3UVH6FEIG4Z66SU/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/AS7YSZ2ZYX5FC7JWLU4PV4JDOMWRO5ZK/?format=api", "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5HK54EDQQ75X5JHFVFXYLQYAGKIE6WIO/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Ah, thanks for clarifying. Unfortunately, if I understand you correctly, we\nwould have to talk to our satellite via digital voice, or at 128kbps, which\nwould be great if we could!\n\n-Nate\n\nOn Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Tom Azlin N4ZPT <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Well, make that the digital voice part of the protocol. The high speed\n> digital data part is up to 128kbps which was not what I was thinking of.\n>\n> 73, tom n4zpt\n>\n> Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:\n>\n>> Hi Nate,\n>>\n>> the D-STAR protocol is only GMSK at 4800 bps and they selected a\n>> time-bandwidth product of 0.5. 4,800 bps or 4k8 is perhaps not talked about\n>> as that IS the standard for D-STAR. So the software there might be\n>> adaptable. that is the reason I thought to suggest it.\n>>\n>> Good luck and 73, Tom n4zpt\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> Nathaniel S. Parsons wrote:\n>>\n>>> Hi Tom,\n>>>\n>>> My mind had indeed played a trick on me, and I remembered MFSK as MSK.\n>>>\n>>> As far as the DStar group goes, I don't see any mention of 4800 bps or\n>>> 4k8\n>>> kbps on the public page, so if it's not the group's focus, I don't want\n>>> to\n>>> have to rely on that solution.\n>>>\n>>> Thanks,\n>>> -Nate KC2SVI\n>>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>>\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>>\n", "attachments": [] }