Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TJBWQAAJX7LPT4UFDFAJXASCKJXRIKVM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001901ca1eb9$6c8acfe0$0300a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "TJBWQAAJX7LPT4UFDFAJXASCKJXRIKVM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NIBAD6O77SIOELIOMUO7CAY5FN5XOXD2/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas",
    "date": "2009-08-16T21:34:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/NIBAD6O77SIOELIOMUO7CAY5FN5XOXD2/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/T6ZXSXL4HNDCJESCNXTGUKQAW57P7QKM/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I will say that I can improve my 437 reception by rotating the beam...I also\nhave gotten better signals by aiming the beam at a point on the ground 100\nfeet away...\n\nWhy criticize? Everyone else can do anything they want to their antennas\nwithout me getting upset...afterall, it's not MY antenna.\n\nNow if someone wants to point me toward scientific theory, antenna modeling\nprograms, propagation theory...then I can stand up and listen...until then,\nmy best signal is most important to me.\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Clint Bradford\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>\nSent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:19 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas\n\n\n> > ... Why are we modifying the Arrow?\n>\n> > ... Because someone's analysis says the element length is all wrong ...\n>\n> So Al Lowe's software program which he used to design these is all wrong?\n>\n> Sorry to get defensive on Al's behalf. This thread just \"feels\" like a\nre-hash of an \"engineer's view vs. real world results\" argument. Like when I\nwas told here - by engineers - that it mattered how I twisted my Arrow while\nworking the sats. \"Ya gotta take polarization into account, Clint - there's\na 22db difference when you turn your antenna 90 degrees - a tremendous\nperformance hit if you don't take this into account ... \"\n>\n> Yet in the real world of demonstrating workin' the birds, there's no such\nperformance degradation. I have hundreds of witnesses to this fact: Capture\nSO-50 and AO-51 with the Arrow and operate TX and RX while twisting the\nantenna in different angles doesn't change the great reception and\ntransmission quality.\n>\n> If you are in the market for an Arrow, I simply suggest that you use it as\noffered to you. You will be pleased with its 2M and 440 amateur bands\nperformance. And leave the modding of the elements w-a-y on the bottom of\nyour \"things to do\" lists.\n>\n> Clint Bradford\n>\n> ----------------------------------\n> Clint Bradford, K6LCS\n> http://www.clintbradford.com\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}