Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TMSBIUR3OO4LSZ7ND6ZGB5WWSJMU6BAC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "04aa01d0487f$81e2b830$85a82890$@net",
    "message_id_hash": "TMSBIUR3OO4LSZ7ND6ZGB5WWSJMU6BAC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UGRECYB75W2EJSPTXYFYXIT2MT4ECJJN/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb2m (a) arrl.net",
        "mailman_id": "a9e21a68ea694587a3f7c02f0f3d12dd",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a9e21a68ea694587a3f7c02f0f3d12dd/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] FJ/N2IEN",
    "date": "2015-02-14T17:56:06Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EQBD4WAA5323ADCR4JC5H7YVXR7FKKQV/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": " I know. I guess I didn't make that clear enough. I saw it in my log thinking it counted for a DX entity when it really didn't. I heard they were going to be there but thought I had it worked. Paul's post led me to check on it and then I realized my logging s/w was smarter then me, as it wasn't giving me credit for it. So when I work them and get credit for the QSO along with K1N I will have 84. Life is good :-)\n\n73 Jeff kb2m\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Sean K. [mailto:[email protected]] \nSent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 10:16 AM\nTo: [email protected]; [email protected]\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] FJ/N2IEN\n\nSt Barts didn't count as a separate DXCC entity until December 14, 2007. \n\n \nSean Kutzko\nAmateur Radio KX9X\n\n________________________________\n\nFrom: \"[email protected]\" <[email protected]>\nTo: [email protected] \nSent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 10:10 AM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] FJ/N2IEN\n\n\nThat's odd, I worked N5AFV/FJ in Dec 2005 on AO-51 when Al stopped there on a cruise. I know he worked a bunch of people when he was there. I never researched the FJ, but  I feel I missed sat DXCC when AO-40 failed. I'm up to 82 confirmed via sat but don't think I ever going to get close to 100 so I don't pay much attention. I also have it on 20m in 2008.\n\n73 Jeff kb2m\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer\nSent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 9:40 AM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] FJ/N2IEN\n\nGood morning,\n\nEarly this morning, I worked FJ/N2IEN on Saint Barthélemy on SO-50.\nThis is a relatively new DXCC, only existing since 2007 (it was part of FS prior).\n\nThis may be the first satellite operation from that DXCC entity. The group will be there until Tuesday.\n\nSee: http://www.dx-world.net/fj-n2ien-fj-ww2dx-fj-w2rest-barts/\n\n73,\n\nPaul, N8HM\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}