Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TNOVN32O3VTPHMAKQ4BSKPMNCGTWUSWJ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAHZ3kP9dob-=0Bk=gGUrC3-pVD0c4JDbL84JYZPK2Jq=ybj4RA@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "TNOVN32O3VTPHMAKQ4BSKPMNCGTWUSWJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TNOVN32O3VTPHMAKQ4BSKPMNCGTWUSWJ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "af5cc (a) fidmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "5cf8802d8c4e4ba09260a676680350af",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/5cf8802d8c4e4ba09260a676680350af/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "John Geiger",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] TYT TH-9000 on satellites",
    "date": "2015-02-06T17:22:59Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Has anyone used one of the TYT TH-9000 UHF models on the satellites?  I am\ncurrently using a Baofeng UV-3R Plus for the SO50 downlink, and think that\nthe receive could be better on a different radio.  The price is nice for\nthe TYT for a brand new FM UHF rig.\n\nThe Jetstream JTS-270M also looks tempting for a dualbander.\n\n73 John AF5CC\n",
    "attachments": []
}