Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TR45LPQ42XB236OLIW3TMSDOSTUBYVU2/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TR45LPQ42XB236OLIW3TMSDOSTUBYVU2",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TR45LPQ42XB236OLIW3TMSDOSTUBYVU2/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "saguaroastro (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "a4a1e7d14c254c03bd1ba487c7a01f6d",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/a4a1e7d14c254c03bd1ba487c7a01f6d/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Richard Tejera",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] AO-85 transponder is a mess",
    "date": "2015-10-09T22:36:01Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "There is a 67.0 Hz tone on uplink well. \n\nRick Tejera K7TEJ\nSaguaro Astronomy Club\nwww.SaguaroAstro.org\nThunderbird Amateur Radio Club\nwww.w7tbc.org\n\nOn October 9, 2015, at 14:40, Daniel Estévez <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nHi all,\r\n\r\nI have listened to AO-85 transponder on its two last passes over Europe.\r\nEquipment is an Arrow antenna, FT-817ND for RX and FT-2D for TX. The\r\nsignal is very good, peaking S9+ on the last overhead pass, and usually\r\nS7 or so (for comparison, SO-50 is usually S0 and peaks S1 or S2 sometimes).\r\n\r\nHowever, the transponder is such a big mess. Many stations are\r\novermodulating the receiver and are in fact very difficult to copy.\r\nEverybody stepping on each other's QSOs and people calling CQ without\r\nlistening.\r\n\r\nWe should probably remind this:\r\nhttp://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=64736\r\n\r\nI tried to get on the transponder, but it seems impossible with just 5W\r\nand many people probably using high power. There have also been some\r\nreports that you might need a bit more than 5W to be heard sometimes.\r\n\r\nJust to confirm: is there any offset on the uplink, or just 435.180 +-\r\nthe usual Doppler should work?\r\n\r\nPerhaps, until the novelty passes away I should limit myself to record\r\nand upload telemetry, because it seems quite difficult to get a QSO in\r\nthis conditions.\r\n\r\nMy apologies for this small rant.\r\n\r\n73,\r\n\r\nDani M0HXM/EA4GPZ.\r\n_______________________________________________\r\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\r\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\r\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\r\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\r\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n",
    "attachments": []
}