Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TSVQCBADQIPMU2GAGNA2Z2MQVLQXF7DP/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TSVQCBADQIPMU2GAGNA2Z2MQVLQXF7DP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LCXSRRNEWR72ST2MSIZZR7UGDYMWO5M5/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n0jy (a) lavabit.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "N0JY",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: satellite durability fm vs. linears",
    "date": "2011-11-30T00:55:54Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ACUS2GGQKQ32HYIKXJ4CA5O5Q4DOIXOQ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Would now be a good time to mention that Fox-1 is designed to operate \nwhile illuminated, even after a battery failure?\n\n73,\nJerry\nN0JY\n\nOn 11/29/2011 5:36 PM, Andrew Koenig wrote:\n> The thing I've been wondering (and this is in no way accusatory, just a\n> question out of curiosity) is why we didn't build the IHU's with NVRAM and\n> a circuit to cut the batteries completely out of the loop. Since the cell\n> failure seems inevitable, it would only make sense to design the satellites\n> in a way that they can work without the batteries when the batteries do\n> fail.\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}