Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TTNF2KNRIGHHMUXH7WAKPFOZM3YX5JEA/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TTNF2KNRIGHHMUXH7WAKPFOZM3YX5JEA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/W4IA7IHTAKWIMHVU7HTMBDOZQLO42VKL/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dguimon1 (a) san.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Guimont",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Verticals and such on SSB birds",
    "date": "2011-04-15T19:29:05Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/W4IA7IHTAKWIMHVU7HTMBDOZQLO42VKL/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 10:07 AM 4/15/2011, you wrote:\n>I have found firsthand that verticals, J poles, and the like work pretty\n>good on FM satellites. How well do these same antennas work on the SSB\n>satellites? Would they make VO52 usable? That seems to be the easiest of\n>the SSB sats to get into. What about FO29?\n\nJohn, go to my site and take a look at quadfil1.zip...It has \nconstruction notes and pics for 2m and 435 quadrifilars.  Mount them \nvertically and they work just fine for most of the pass.\n\nMeasure the tubing accurately for the 435 to keep vswr down...\n\nThey are easy to build, inexpensive, and have used them for years on \nall of the sats you mentioned.\n\nAnd they will even receive Phil's new modes!!!\n\nhttp://cid-1973adc8c1d3207c.skydrive.live.com/summary.aspx?sa=140581470\n\n\n\n\n\n            73, Dave, WB6LLO\n                [email protected]\n\n                    Disagree: I learn....\n\n               Pulling for P3E... \n",
    "attachments": []
}