Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TU75WPHTYLQEKTAYXB5JL3NGH3JGTFWM/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TU75WPHTYLQEKTAYXB5JL3NGH3JGTFWM/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TU75WPHTYLQEKTAYXB5JL3NGH3JGTFWM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TU75WPHTYLQEKTAYXB5JL3NGH3JGTFWM/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kl0s (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "5bc617e3efc441338f8c6a5654b9d6eb",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/5bc617e3efc441338f8c6a5654b9d6eb/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dino Papas",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?",
    "date": "2016-04-01T02:22:58Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I run LMR400 out to the preamps just below the rotator then LMR240 for the short run from the preamps to the antennas; the 240 is quite flexible and the additional loss in that short run is negligible.\n\n73 - Dino KL0S\n\n> On Mar312016, at 2135 PM, Scott <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> I hope to put up my first rotating antenna soon and just received a nice length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not \"super-flex\")\n> \n> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it would be.  I would call it \"medium\"... not stiff as a pipe but not floppy, either.\n> \n> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I should attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?\n> \n> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to an antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?\n> \n> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what cable would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project is 70cm.\n> \n> Thanks!\n> \n> -Scott, K4KDR\n> Montpelier, VA  USA\n",
    "attachments": []
}