Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TZ7KNZBRGOGODIHTQ6RY5BL3SV6WFXPH/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "TZ7KNZBRGOGODIHTQ6RY5BL3SV6WFXPH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TZ7KNZBRGOGODIHTQ6RY5BL3SV6WFXPH/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k0blt (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "82d15e0ada534ea6845440278a076b63",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/82d15e0ada534ea6845440278a076b63/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Frank A Cahoy",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Vanity call",
    "date": "2007-09-14T11:56:49Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nHello to all,\n\nAgain I seek the advice and council of the BB group on a non satellite\nrelated matter.  \n\nIn January of this year a dear friend became an SK suddenly and\nunexpetedly by a simple fall on the ice.  His XYL (also a ham) would like\nto get his call as a vanity.  Some tell me that there is a three year\nwait and others say that this rule does not apply when it's an immediate\nrelative.  Has anyone out there experienced or had any close encounters\nwith this sort of situation? \n\nThank you  in advance for any information.   No need to post any answers\nto the BB but replies directly would be appreciated.  Your choice!  73 to\nall.  Frank,  KØBLT       \n",
    "attachments": []
}