Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/U7ZG5Y2YGJMTDHQ7OZNVLXBQOBX32Y6W/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/U7ZG5Y2YGJMTDHQ7OZNVLXBQOBX32Y6W/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "U7ZG5Y2YGJMTDHQ7OZNVLXBQOBX32Y6W",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FEBDCQJ3PAKZ6UFGO4JPZNHRAZYXDDMR/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "davegoncalves (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "f97ac5d9d47c4e819df184cb1822b3a7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/f97ac5d9d47c4e819df184cb1822b3a7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "David Goncalves",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E",
    "date": "2006-09-07T15:27:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D2LMUGAGLJ7CF5W2DDQ5WYKUY2PEWN3X/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3M3MCZB4IWLISTVRWWAI7EUOLQCYBZKE/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I love these messages; I really can't get enough of them. They really\nbrighten my day.\nIf Luc and AMSAT would bind these into a book, I'd buy it. I'd call it \"The\nAMSAT Anthology of Conspiracy\".\n\nLuc, keep on doing what you are doing.\n\nDave W1EUJ\n\n> Disappointed to find out that there will not be an S band downlink on\n> Eagle\n> >\n> > Will there be an S band downlink on the P3E bird???\n> >\n> > Sure hate having to fork over more money each time a new satellite goes\n> up\n> > because previous up/downlinks are not being used anymore....makes me\n> wish\n> > for more mode A LEO birds (grin)\n> >\n> >                                     73, Joe W2KJ\n>\n> Another bad move by AMSAT-NA... I don't know if they look at their famous\n> survey about their\n> members opinions here? Probably not could be some one will wake up from\n> lethargy at the next\n> symposium and voices opinions about the maintaining of mode S.\n>\n> If AMSAT-NA is building sats in close circle they just have to openly\n> admitted it even if admission\n> is not a very spoken word they can at least give some explanations on\n> their facts who leads them to\n> scrap mode S?\n>\n> Interference? even if they wants to go higher at the time eagle will be in\n> space the higher\n> frequencies will be as crowded as 2.4 actually. We actually see some\n> decreased in 2.4 ghz apparatus\n> as the public always want the most recent goodies even FRS/GMRS are moving\n> to 5.2 ghz.\n>\n> Suggestion: At the next AMSAT-NA 2006 Space Symposium it will appropriate\n> to voices opinions to the\n> BOD asking them to maintain as planned the mode S.\n>\n> Just to pointed out on a 2005 AMSAT-NA Dayton Hamvention  Jim Sanford\n> WB4GCS made a presentation on\n> eagle project and he said i quote \" S band will be our bread and butter on\n> the downlink\" a\n> prototype of L/S and C/S where planned for the 2005 Symposium at that\n> time.\n>\n> He also mention that the C/C project in on a bleeding edge technology\n> (read experimental) and they\n> where not too sure if they will even be able to make it.\n>\n> Why the C/C band project? he let go this \" this will permit some folks to\n> use it from their\n> balcony\" the cat goes out the bag AGAIN the same ECHO mindings are\n> resurecting...The guy with an HT\n> will be able to make it without using a huge antenna!\n>\n> We will never be able to get rid of this obsession and you know now why\n> they want to move up?  The\n> guy who live on a balcony is living in an apartment complex where S band\n> in unusable. Here is why\n> the C/C project come up. How many actual sat operator are living in\n> apartments? the majority of\n> some of them?\n>\n> Here is the whole logics behind this mode S scrapping. If you read a bit\n> behind the lines you will\n> see he speak about P3E where mode S will be present and he confirm some\n> collaboration between both\n> teams. He also say some of the Eagle builders are funding their own\n> project. From this since 2005\n> we can only see the builders behind the C/C project pushing so hard to a\n> point to get the money\n> previously intended for the 2 S mode TX redirected to their C/C project.\n>\n> Who is driving AMSAT-NA an hollow BOD? an hollow president? Or a third\n> builders manipulating wing\n> who blackmail the BOD?\n>\n> None of them? I let the conclusion yours!\n>\n> P.S.To the BOD its not the best way to attract new members or convince\n> those who leave to rejoin!\n>\n> \"-\"\n> The medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n>\n> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n> Skype VE2DWE\n> www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n> Former AMSAT-NA coordonnator and member.\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n\n-- \nDavid Goncalves\n",
    "attachments": []
}