Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UCJ24OQU6YKMWTF2NKW73JVKBF6RWWKS/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAKXf1rHmRU2ETzxjd6=tOJC=AHvf9B_8RwYNbrtyF6rnf87Q=g@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "UCJ24OQU6YKMWTF2NKW73JVKBF6RWWKS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UCJ24OQU6YKMWTF2NKW73JVKBF6RWWKS/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wouterweg (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Wouter Weggelaar",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] NAYIF-1 TLEs",
    "date": "2017-02-19T16:00:55Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MYCNLT7YLHZL47F6S4QFXP5JDEHOGABE/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi All,\n\nThe post-launch TLEs for NAYIF-1 are starting to become out-of date.\nWe have produced a new set of unofficial TLEs that take into account\nthe new AOS / TCA / LOS timings.\n\nPlease however note that the post-launch TLEs do not contain the\ncorrect constants to make this TLE reliable in the long run.\n\nThe only object that comes close in the recent TLEs from JSpOC is the\n2017-008F object, but note that we are still missing a lot of objects.\nThey are working round the clock to map and catalog all remaining\nobjects, but 104 satellites presents a challenge.\n\nWe are in contact with JSpOC about this and are doing our best to help\nthem match up objects.\n\nFor now, the unofficial ones are:\nNAYIF-corrected\n1 17003U 17002A   17046.17714120 0.00000000  00000-0  00000-0 0  9994\n2 17003  97.5521 107.5843 0004848 278.6481 296.8511 15.21991390    02\n\nand\n\n2017-008F-corrected\n1 17004U 17008F   17050.08273148  .00155491  00000-0  65272-2 0  9998\n2 17004  97.5078 111.7095 0000538  25.3680 334.7132 15.22769132   566\n\nAnd we welcome any observations with regard to which one you used and\nhow much it was off.\n\nI would think the 2017-008F variant will work better in the long run,\nbut we will have to see.\n\n73\n\nWouter PA3WEG\n",
    "attachments": []
}