Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UYY4IXDNVJZU6FJKJ63PUL4M3AOJMC7E/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "D2F74372A82D48718D851844F4F16404@David",
    "message_id_hash": "UYY4IXDNVJZU6FJKJ63PUL4M3AOJMC7E",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/N57IVYTLM25FPSR5V4RQEOK6FUREZFSX/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "david (a) cdwing.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "David Wing",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe",
    "date": "2009-10-13T21:40:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z3A75CMQQYUTYALMJXXV65T5CHUP6PCE/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I do that on FM repeaters and on the birds when I'm working with people who\nrecognize my call sign or are likely to.  I'll switch to phonetics if there\nis someone new to me or when I'm calling CQ\n\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Samudra Haque N3RDX\nSent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:11 PM\nTo: Tony Langdon\nCc: [email protected]; Gary Lockhart; Eric Knaps,ON4HF\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe\n\nI asked as I am still puzzled why in the US on local FM nets hams just\nuse \"n,3,r,d,x\" instead of \"november three romeo david x-ray\".\n\n\n\nOn Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Tony Langdon <[email protected]> wrote:\n> At 07:30 AM 10/14/2009, Samudra Haque wrote:\n>>\n>> on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say \"A, B, C\" instead of\n>> \"Alfa Bravo Charlie\" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid\n>> locators ?\n>\n> That can backfire and waste time, due to people not understanding the\n> letters.  For example, my callsign under adverse conditions could be mis\n> heard as (heard most of the following on terrestrial repeaters or\n> IRLP/Echolink, let alone on the birds!):\n>\n> VK3JEB\n> VK3JD\n> VK3JB\n> VK3JEV\n> VK3JV\n>\n> And the list goes on.... ;)  The overhead in asking for clarification or\n> getting a correction outweighs the overhead of using phonetics in most\n> cases.  Once callsigns are confirmed, you can drop the phonetics (though\n> usually by then, the QSO is over, so someone else can have a go ;) ).\n>  Phonetics are also more likely to survive brief bursts of QRM or brief\n> fades.\n>\n> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL\n> http://vkradio.com\n>\n>\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}