Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UZ3NTXFJNQ63NMKG53IUSW3I26RPCG6L/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "UZ3NTXFJNQ63NMKG53IUSW3I26RPCG6L",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/UZ3NTXFJNQ63NMKG53IUSW3I26RPCG6L/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "archie.hackett (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Hackett",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: [eu-amsat] AO-7",
    "date": "2007-04-25T11:27:33Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5LHZWA6GROZ5ZCQVY3BUJAX2322G426I/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi MaK,\n           I'm not so sure a BLACK LIST is the way to go, however, we most \ncertainly DO! need to be aware of the \"alligator\" ... (all mouth and no \nears) ... problem on AO-7. I read quite recently a post on the Amsat-bb \nwherea particular station was \"explaining\" that one *NEEDS* a linear \namplifier to work AO-7.\n\nAbsolutely *not* true ... (using an aerial !!!!! might have \nhelped.....LA2QAA & GM1SXX).\n\nOf course, today's FM'ing on AO-7 *may* have been due to ignorance, not \ndeliberate QRM, we'll never know but we should !!! encourage people to \nLISTEN before transmitting ... after all, it *IS* full duplex.\n\nI'd suggest \"education\" to be a better alternative than a\"black list\" ... \nAlligators will always! be with us with the \"mine's bigger than yours!\" \nmenality.\n\nA re-read of the recommended operating proceedure would do no harm. This \napplies to *ALL* satellites.\n\nPS.\n\nLA2QAA and GM1SXX will soon be publishing an article suggesting a way to \noperate satellites for those amateurs who have severe aerial restrictions or \nwho don't currently own the necessary equipment.\n\nI will of course put a link to the article concerned on the EU-Amsat pages.\n\n73 John.   <[email protected]>\n\n.........................................................................................................................................\n\n\n>From: SV1BSX <[email protected]>\n>Reply-To: [email protected]\n>To: [email protected]\n>Subject: Re: [eu-amsat] AO-7\n>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:48:26 -0700 (PDT)\n>\n>  Hi John,\n>\n>  well, I suggest to make a BLACK LIST  (and publish\n>that anywhere, like Amsat-BB etc ).\n>\n>Why not?\n>\n>  This way I believe that, every LID(= bad-operator)\n>will be more careful in order to avoid the LIST!\n>\n>   After the closed-down of FO-29, we have to care much\n>more about AO-7's good-health.\n>\n>73, Mak SV1BSX\n>\n>\n>--- John Hackett <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> > Hi All,\n> >         Somebody knocking 10 kinds of the brown\n> > stuff out of AO-7 this\n> > morning on orbit 48458.\n> >\n> > Careful !! with the power chaps or we'll lose this\n> > one as well.\n> >\n> > The recommended operating proceedure can be found at\n> > ...\n> >\n> > <http://www.planetemily.com/ao7/ao7log.php> Just\n> > click on \"Using AO-7\".\n> >\n> > The more potential new users who are aware that you\n> > *DON'T* need 100w to a\n> > 10 element beam, the more likely it is that AO-7\n> > will continue to provide\n> > excellent analogue signals.\n> >\n> > 73 John.   <[email protected]>\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}