Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "BAFCBF5DAF844533B3E1D766E981FDF6@JamesPC",
    "message_id_hash": "V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/V43NAZPY62RAX5A3CKHTHF7OR7PCU5XP/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jdanehy (a) cinci.rr.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Jim Danehy",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  ERP is not QRP apples and oranges",
    "date": "2008-12-20T01:01:12Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IIJSUHBNHHFV6QNO4TL4YN3ZZVYQNWTW/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/BFUUQEYIEXKZVQUHG7VI4YNVIMQ3ML5D/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VOIXJM2IPRUGCWQWPEVG56UHJKPRNJSC/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "ERP   is not  QRP   . . . . . . I never saw anything in FCC exams about QRP or ERP but it has been a long time for me since I was last examined . . .  \n\nfolks are confusing ERP and QRP . . .  5 watts out QRP driving an amp . . .  get real . . .  it is 5 watts out of the final stage feeding the antenna . . . the gain of the antenna does not have anything to do with QRP it has to do with ERP . . .  one is apples and the other is oranges . . . the original issue arose out of someone feeling that folks using the AO 51  QRP channel were not using QRP . . . well I use 5 watts on the QRP channel but I only have fairly big yagis for satellites . . . If the goal is to have HT users with compromised antennas use the \"QRP\" channel then drop the QRP designation and ask the users to keep the power to 5 watts out from the final stage of the transmitter and then  WHAT  ? ? ?   5 watts many can compute but that is it . . . ERP is guess work by most . . . that is my point . . . seems senseless to me but surprising the responses . . . ERP is not QRP different concepts . . .  apples and oranges . . . .\n\nJim  W9VNE\n",
    "attachments": []
}