Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V6HQICVRUF73BLSYSKTKUBUC6PW7LTEZ/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V6HQICVRUF73BLSYSKTKUBUC6PW7LTEZ/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "CAGHdFOSk7TTOQEU=tOYLipoWCBdwgN+xJTXkSfQHM2egSd-fVQ@mail.gmail.com", "message_id_hash": "V6HQICVRUF73BLSYSKTKUBUC6PW7LTEZ", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Q6RUFOSYPBOWVDYZ3FTZZBMPYI3GI6ZW/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "jhwelsh (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": null, "emails": null }, "sender_name": "Jeff Welsh", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite QSO's and LoTW", "date": "2011-10-27T16:04:08Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Y57J2SSTTUYU6DUKVQBVXA4FHSUAPU5D/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Thanks for the clarification! Now I need to go correct my logbook.\n\n73\n--jeff\nN3QO\n\nOn Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) <\[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Hi Jeff!\n>\n> > I was curious what the standard was for Logbook of the World (LoTW)\n> > reporting. Which band do you log your QSO with, Uplink or Downlink?\n>\n> The standard should be what is shown in N5JB's helpful PDF\n> for satellite operators using LoTW. It is available from the\n> ARRL web site:\n>\n> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf\n>\n> The BAND field should be the uplink band. The FREQ field is\n> not mandatory for LoTW, but it can also be uploaded to show\n> the uplink frequency you used.\n>\n> > I've been seeing mix results coming back via LoTW, where HRD Log defaults\n> to\n> > using the downlink frequency although I've had some QSO's report back\n> using\n> > the uplink. I do also log the satellite, mode and propagation type.\n>\n> The PROP_MODE and SAT_NAME fields must be present for a\n> QSO to be a satellite QSO in LoTW. Make sure the satellite\n> name matches with the list at the bottom of the LoTW FAQ page:\n>\n> https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq\n>\n> Otherwise, LoTW may try to match that up as a non-satellite QSO.\n> Again, N5JB's document does a great job of explaining things\n> related to satellite operators using LoTW.\n>\n> When I made my first uploads to LoTW earlier this year, I only\n> uploaded the seven fields as listed on the top of page two in\n> N5JB's PDF. I had several thousand satellite QSOs I wanted\n> to upload, along with the setup in TQSL for dozens of station\n> locations and getting all the certificates for my call signs.\n> Once the initial setup was done, and I had those QSOs in the\n> system, it has been easy to keep up with the uploads for\n> subsequent activity. I now include the 3 optional fields (uplink\n> frequency, downlink band and frequency) in my LoTW uploads\n> to have a more-complete QSO record - even though those\n> additional fields have no effect on what becomes a QSL in LoTW.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n", "attachments": [] }