Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V7K6IGDT5CZUMFHUPRNOWT575A72D4FK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "V7K6IGDT5CZUMFHUPRNOWT575A72D4FK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AMNC6SGMIPLRTOV7K66AF7KZB4534OFS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n4qwf1 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "8ff6e4ef2f9e4d82a21ee63d740aaf45",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8ff6e4ef2f9e4d82a21ee63d740aaf45/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "John Price",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FD Contacts!",
    "date": "2007-06-27T17:37:50Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L5OBVTW43WCZ3CUWUSXE6JL5EGS4EGHB/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I might be guilty. I did respond to a few others after I made my\ncontact on AO-51 L/U. Does this mean they can't count me as there one\ncontact? Does it disqualify me from counting my contact since I might\nhave broken the rule on this transponder? Maybe I am going to be\ndisqualified from ever being on satellite at field day again.  I\nreally don't understand the problem here. Give me a break.\n\n73's << John\n\nOn 6/27/07, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hi Bruce!\n>\n> > I would suggest that those that have a problem interrupting the rules\n> > for Field Day, weather they be AMSAT rules or ARRL rules, contact either\n> > myself for the AMSAT rules or the ARRL for their rules. Everyone on this\n> > BB can interrupt them anyway they choose but only those in authority to\n> > make a ruling can say what the correct interruption is. I would\n> > entertain AMSAT's interruption off the list.\n>\n> Since this has been going back and forth on here, maybe if there was\n> a public announcement on how at least you will interpret the rule per\n> the AMSAT Field Day rules, this discussion could be wrapped up.\n>\n> When I was on SO-50 and AO-27 Saturday afternoon as W7ON, I made\n> my single contact with a station during each pass.  Then I was called by\n> other stations.  I responded with my exchange and logged the additional\n> contacts.  When I prepare the log and score it for submission to AMSAT\n> and ARRL, I will not count the additional contacts on each of those passes\n> as points.  I didn't have that \"problem\" Sunday morning on an AO-51\n> pass... I made my contact, listened for another minute or two to ensure\n> noboy else was trying to call me, then I shut down the satellite gear so I\n> could go back to HF.\n>\n> Another thought... under ARRL Field Day rules, satellites are treated as a\n> single \"band\", just like any of the HF bands.  The ARRL Field Day log\n> sheets have no place to indicate which satellite was used for each contact.\n> I will note the satellite I used for each of those contacts, probably\n> in the right\n> margin of the sheet, for each contact to show I am counting for points only\n> one contact per FM satellite.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n\n-- \nN4QWF Amateur Radio Operator\nAO-7,AO-27,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52\nInternet [email protected]\nFormerly KC4AHW  VK3FEZ\nAmsat Member #27845\nDXCC #33,478\nVUCC SAT #135\nWAS SAT #296\n51 on 51 #13\nLON -79.25 LAT 37.45 Grid FM07\n>From the Foothills of the Blueridge\n",
    "attachments": []
}