Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VCOYSP24QUESKB2YVU5DTPXXJWOGIXAC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "000601c734be$35004830$9831200a@notepad8",
    "message_id_hash": "VCOYSP24QUESKB2YVU5DTPXXJWOGIXAC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JC2V6CJKC3ISTPNJHHPAF6AWRHFMJLZM/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "howard (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Crossbooms ... my pennyworth.",
    "date": "2007-01-10T13:49:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FC6C6XJP3OP45A3NMRYZD7U4EO6M4R7G/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Bruce \n\n> I believe it was on this list that I read of an alternative \n> to fiberglass booms (of which there are none in my local sales \n> area). My new 10' boom comprises sched. 40 conduit with an \n> snug-fitting 8' length of doweling placed inside. Others have \n> removed any 'play' between the doweling and the conduit by \n> spraying expanding foam inside the ends of the conduit. I \n> suppose one should cap the ends, too. The total cost of this \n> for me was CAN $20. The antennas, rotors and mast are on \n> sawhorses now, but as far as I can see the conduit-dowel \n> boom has an appropriate stiffness.\n\nI agree, this is a good way of doing it - ISTR I've seen it mentioned\npreviously on the -BB.\n\n> Howard mentioned the much-documented advantages of polarization switching\n> for LEO satellite work. In this same context, is it worth the additional\n> work to include the remote logic required for V and H polarizations along\n> with RHCP and LHCP? \n\nIt's a nice to have, but not as much as being able to switch R/LHCP. I\ncurrently use the WIMO polarisation switches and they happen to have all\nfour polarisations built in.\n\n73, Howard G6LVB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}