Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VDM7MXHOSMYLIPVHCBDHZ76ZFL6HL2VW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "002201c786c1$b0995f40$0200a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "VDM7MXHOSMYLIPVHCBDHZ76ZFL6HL2VW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NH4MYQRUH7KZJMM2GY5VQDAQCQCDGXTS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Government control has\texceededconstitutionallimitations.",
    "date": "2007-04-24T22:41:23Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RUME6PL4CH6OW6JB2BKXL67DTMGK3G3I/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "In Boston, we have been restricted to 50W output from our repeaters on 440\nfor 10 years. By complying with this restriction I believe we have been a\n\"courteous guest.\"\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"jmfranke\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"AMSAT BB\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 5:52 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Government control has\nexceededconstitutionallimitations.\n\n\n> I for one am happy the government allows us to be a guest on this band and\nI\n> always strive to be a courteous guest.  I do not want to impose costs and\n> limitations to their system(s).  The government has clearly stated what\nthey\n> consider to be acceptable behavior, which is not onerous.  Surely the\n> amateur community can operate effectively with these restrictions.\n>\n> Nor do I want to be kicked out because of rude behavior from others.  I am\n> glad the ARRL is trying to present a good face for the amateur radio\n> community.  In the past, the government has provided us with free\nlaunches,\n> still provides orbital elements, and has protected this band from\ncommercial\n> incursions.  I want friendly relations to be maintained and do not like\nthe\n> in your face attitude of many amateur radio operators.\n>\n> The government has more systems in this band.  As a former radar operator\non\n> US Navy E-2 Hawkeye aircraft, I often saw amateur transmissions, including\n> ATV, on the radar which operates in the 70cm band.  In most cases, I\nmerely\n> changed channels up or down in frequency to avoid any mutual interference.\n> The Navy also has shipboard radars in this band, SPS-40, etc.\n>\n> The PAVE PAWS serves many task masters including the tracking of\nsatellites\n> and spacecraft.\n>\n> While the PAVE PAWS radars are capable of narrow beam widths, they are\nstill\n> susceptible to interference from signals entering the antenna sidelobes.\n> Any reduction in sensitivity or function is a cost to us all.\n>\n>\n>\n> John  WA4WDL\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}