Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VECFP7M4FBHRQEHSCDXWYY3GDHRVCSUF/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VECFP7M4FBHRQEHSCDXWYY3GDHRVCSUF/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "VECFP7M4FBHRQEHSCDXWYY3GDHRVCSUF", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/4BFSA2WATCZTKUKYZ4S3MDL2HLESSOBE/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "ve9qrp (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": "4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4d6061838db34aba9a1c4722addebfaf/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Bruce Robertson", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: BBsat Call for ideas", "date": "2008-11-26T17:18:57Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DMQHMVSJUUGL6VHCNFTXW26EOFLNB5TC/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/L7PU356DM4QRY2XUVADOVWMA5L7ISHM2/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Thanks to all for a fun and engaging thread.\n\nOne idea that hasn't been floated yet, but which I believe deserves\nconsideration, is a 10m or 15m transmitter aboard bbSat. Years before\nactually being able to communicate through an amateur satellite, I\nlistened to the RS robots on 10m and 15m, and that achievement gave me\nthe confidence to proceed. I therefore think a transponder that\ndownlinked on these bands would be likely to 'broaden our base', and\nit would help keep active these, now unused, satellite bands.\n\nI recognize that transmitting on such a long wavelength from a 10cm\ncube represents a technical challenge, but it would largely be a\nchallenge of mechanical engineering, not something that would run up\nagainst the limited power budget. I also vaguely have the impression\nthat amplifiers, etc. are more efficient in the lower frequencies, so\nthat might be a plus. (Not to mention reduced path loss.) Perhaps the\neffective power out would be so low that a directional antenna would\nbe required on the ground. In which case, I'd say it was a no-go,\nsince that would preclude too many of the new experimenters that we'd\nbe hoping to snare on these bands.\n", "attachments": [] }