Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VMWYRNNLV23EPJ3EUJK2REGWIEUUAT4N/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "060420090307.29401.4A273A7E0007E01E000072D922230682329B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF049BCC02@att.net",
    "message_id_hash": "VMWYRNNLV23EPJ3EUJK2REGWIEUUAT4N",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2WRDRX6OYQ2A4NO2PXNKYLNA2TUZECFS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n3tl (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 milliwatt CW",
    "date": "2009-06-04T03:07:42Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PXMNSBY7E733JS2CR652P5SXGLOE7QOD/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "No doubt. I've gotten lazy with the ability to work from a shack, such as it is, and write down contacts. That didn't serve me well this evening.\n-------------- Original message from \"Roger Kolakowski\" <[email protected]>: -------------- \n\n\n> Maybe time to get that tape recorder back out?? \n> \n> Roger \n> WA1KAT \n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \n> To: \n> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:18 PM \n> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-7 milliwatt CW \n> \n> \n> > Hey everyone, \n> > \n> > I worked the AO-7 pass just after 00:00 UTC here because it had a maximum \n> elevation for me of almost 89 degrees. I wanted to see how much, if any, my \n> ability to work would expand when runninng a half-watt if a used CW instead \n> of SSB. \n> > \n> > On this pass, at least, I had a copyable signal from 30 degrees to 30 \n> degrees, and made a partial contact at 00:15 UTC with a station whose call \n> sign I did not fully copy - which is totally my fault. The call was WA4 (or, \n> at least, that's what I copied), but I didn't catch the suffix. The signal \n> faded slightly, and I didn't ask for a repeat. That's embarrassing, and I \n> apologize to the operator for that. When he called me, AO-7 was below 35 \n> degrees. I reported a 589 to him, and he gave me a 559, which exceeded my \n> expectations. When we finished the QSO, AO-7 was at 28 degrees elevation to \n> my location, and I faded into the noise. \n> > \n> > It'll take a few more passes, at least, to say with some measure of \n> certainty, but it appears that, for my station, I probably can expect to \n> have workable signals at a half-watt out on AO-7 at 50 degrees elevation and \n> above in SSB, and at 30 degrees elevation and above in CW. Given the \n> compromises I choose to have with a fully portable station, that's not to \n> bad for milliwatts. \n> > \n> > 73 to all, \n> > \n> > Tim - N3TL \n> > _______________________________________________ \n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n> > \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}