Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VNSZ5N3E6ULTVJURQXOTZNTKGABEPUZL/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "6C4027D74E1D4208887056AD6D28C1F1@QUECREEK",
    "message_id_hash": "VNSZ5N3E6ULTVJURQXOTZNTKGABEPUZL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JQNBDHKQ4H2ZASQWAGICSBOIGCCZEWOY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wb3jfs (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bdfc678d05af4f3f96c14d823fd3fbcf/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Jeff Yanko",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs",
    "date": "2011-01-22T20:44:24Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IDZJ5JW75FFPPXVV77YWE6KRUIKUVD52/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7Q425VMKJLR5HWNCLJUW4PXXOEMQJPOS/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi John and all,\n\n>From what I recall with the old VUCC application it was discouraged to send \ncards to HQ and to use local card checkers for VUCC.  With the new \napplication it seems like they will accept cards at HQ for VUCC but there is \na cost.  However, it doesn't state what to do if you take them to a card \nchecker?  On Thursday, I had sent an e-mail to Bill Moore, head of the \nawards division at ARRL HQ, and haven't receive a reply back as of Saturday \nmorning.  In any case, we'll find out sooner or later.\n\n\n73,\n\nJeff  WB3JFS\n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Zachary Beougher\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"John Neeley\" <[email protected]>; \"Rick - WA4NVM\" <[email protected]>; \n\"Jeff Yanko\" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>\nSent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 6:38 AM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n\n\n> Do you need to pay the card checker the $.20/QSO, or is that only if you \n> send them directly to ARRL??\n>\n> I agree with Rick - the wording is not very clear.\n>\n> Zack\n> KD8KSN\n>\n> -----Original Message----- \n> From: John Neeley\n> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:07 AM\n> To: Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko ; [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n>\n> Sounds like to me all the better to find a Card Checker in your area \n> before\n> sending anything to ARRL.  Save on postage, etc.  Hopefully the Card \n> Checker\n> wont want his cut too now?  Sign of the times, it looks like to me...\n>\n> John W6ZKH\n> #37184\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> ________________________________\n> From: Rick - WA4NVM <[email protected]>\n> To: Jeff Yanko <[email protected]>; [email protected]\n> Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:54:02 AM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs\n>\n>\n>\n> Hi Jeff and the BB,\n>\n> I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date\n> 2009,\n> and the new form, date Jan. 2011)  see following website:\n>\n> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf\n>\n> It looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple \n> fees\n> for postage, the application and number of contacts.   If I'm \n> comprehending\n> this correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a\n> ARRL\n> member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:\n>\n> $1 postage,  $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00\n>\n> Is this correct?  I welcome all replies, if not.\n>\n> 73 all,\n>\n> Rick WA4NVM\n>\n>\n>> Hi all,\n>>\n>> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they\n>> now\n>> charge 20 cents per QSO.  Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent \n>> to\n>> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?\n>> Thanks in advance!\n>>\n>>\n>> 73,\n>>\n>> Jeff  WB3JFS\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}