Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VOECVNGX75AB3TKEALIKRA67EE6SSRNJ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "VOECVNGX75AB3TKEALIKRA67EE6SSRNJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/VOECVNGX75AB3TKEALIKRA67EE6SSRNJ/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k0vty (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "69d7c9bb693a4435bee46454dd0afb25",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/69d7c9bb693a4435bee46454dd0afb25/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package - EMCOMM",
    "date": "2007-12-20T19:44:57Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I understand Roger.\n\nSince Katrina there has been reported activity by ARRL and Home Land\nSecurity \nthat tend to reach for the GEO type capability\nWithout the AMSAT ability I might add.\nAt this stage it is all conjecture which hopes to not miss anything.\nEspecially funds\n\nJoe  K0VTY\n===============\n Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:35:18 -0500 \"Roger Kolakowski\" <[email protected]>\nwrites:\n> Joe noted...\n> \n> \"...> The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's \n> for\n> emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago....<\n> \n> Please don't misinterpret me...It has been mentioned many times that \n> ARRL\n> does not necessarily have Satellite interests as one of their \n> primary\n> objectives.\n> \n> The status of contesting through satellites is one example.\n> \n> I mentioned ARRL only in recognition of past efforts and \n> accomplishments in\n> supporting EMCOMM...a decision would have to be made as to whether \n> they have\n> expertise or influence remaining in that area, other than an \n> existing large\n> organization of amateur radio operators. Do we as AMSAT need to \n> generate\n> that pool of talent or do we choose to \"borrow\" from it to meet \n> satellite\n> EMCOMM goals?\n> \n> Roger\n> WA1KAT\n> \n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; \n> <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:58 PM\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: The Whole GEO Package - EMCOMM\n> \n> \n> > The notion that Maybe ARRL should be the driver(s) of GEO's\n> > for emergency satellite radio flew past a moment ago.\n> > At least it would appear the issue is larger than just AMSAT-NA\n> >\n> > Joe K0VTY\n> > ==================\n> \n> \n> \n",
    "attachments": []
}