Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VQE6YZUPXR6BSKXDUGNFUQRZZJEMP36J/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "091020061611.4064.4504391C0007E91700000FE022007510900B9D04C999@comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "VQE6YZUPXR6BSKXDUGNFUQRZZJEMP36J",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/VQE6YZUPXR6BSKXDUGNFUQRZZJEMP36J/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Two Sats",
    "date": "2006-09-10T16:11:08Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello\nI and a few others \"played\" with this concept back in the RS etc days.  I forget (senior moment) the specific satellites and frequencies involved.  I was though a bit complicated.  Tracking two satellites (using a Commodore 64) and figuring muliple doppler effects, due to satellite relative speeds.  Anyway it was a fun endeavor.  With HEO's you could cover the whole planet.\n73 Bob W7LRD\nSeattle\n\n-------------- Original message -------------- \nFrom: [email protected] \n\n> If two sats like Hamsat (or Echo) were in orbit at the same time and \n> could see each other ... \n> \n> Could User#1 uplink to Sat-A and then Sat-A would link to Sat-B \n> (probably on one of the higher microwave bands) then Sat-B would \n> downlink to User#2 and User#2 would uplink to Sat-B and be relayed to \n> Sat-A and down to User#1 ?? \n> \n> If this could be done there would be a much larger footprint and \n> launch costs would be far less expensive, correct? \n> \n> Les W4SCO \n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}