Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/VUV72PRF23DTTMHA6LEBSPP7ASQXRPZL/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "VUV72PRF23DTTMHA6LEBSPP7ASQXRPZL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7VYDVXRWLPIOZSBZOFH7I6PW7OHXCUOD/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "peter.guelzow (a) kourou.de",
        "mailman_id": "c1ef441a593c454695e682f65935fe93",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/c1ef441a593c454695e682f65935fe93/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Peter Guelzow",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Cost of an HEO launch",
    "date": "2008-07-20T20:47:15Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/J7RUPMPMED4Z6LD6HSTAYFGH3LSDPIE5/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "There is an interesting interview here:\nhttp://www.hobbyspace.com/AAdmin/archive/Interviews/Systems/ElonMusk.html\n\n73s Peter DB2OS\n\n\n\nBill Ress wrote:\n> Hi Dave,\n>\n> While SpaceX only works with primary single manifest customers, but if \n> those customers can't use the entire payload, then they can work with \n> third party multi-manifest \"brokers\" and we in turn could work with \n> these multi-manifest \"brokers\" for a piece of the payload. For sure, \n> lots of negotiating required when and if we find that a primary manifest \n> customer doesn't need the whole payload.\n>\n> I really don't know if AMSAT management has any activity pursuing this \n> avenue of launch, but if they don't, they should!!\n>\n> Regards,,,Bill - N6GHz (AMSAT Board Candidate)\n>\n> Dave hartzell wrote:\n>   \n>> David-\n>>\n>> Actually, the SpaceX Falcon 1 or 1e could put a spacecraft into HEO or\n>> lunar transfer orbit:\n>>\n>> http://www.spacex.com/FalconLunarCapabilityGuide.pdf\n>>\n>> The stated cost for this is around $9m.  Of course, they haven't\n>> gotten a successful orbit yet from a F1....maybe the third time will\n>> be the charm.  Hitching a ride on a larger launch vehicle like the F9\n>> is interesting, assuming there is capacity and the willingness to be a\n>> guinea pig (and there WILL be a cost to anyone wanting a ride)...\n>>\n>> It will be interesting to see what launch opportunities will be\n>> available in the next few years (if any)...\n>>\n>> Dave\n>> AF6KD\n>>\n>>\n>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:40 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:\n>>   \n>>     \n>>> The anticipated 'going rate' for this new vehicle is shown at the bottom of\n>>> the page.\n>>>\n>>> _http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php_ (http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php)\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> Test flight anyone?\n>>>\n>>> David\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>>     \n>>>       \n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>>\n>>   \n>>     \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}