Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/W3PL6B4AEN4KZRE5APJ7J4DDQ2QD2ODB/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001801c98a4b$920437a0$0300a8c0@Tanguray",
    "message_id_hash": "W3PL6B4AEN4KZRE5APJ7J4DDQ2QD2ODB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/W3PL6B4AEN4KZRE5APJ7J4DDQ2QD2ODB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger Kolakowski",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  Fw:   PE1RAH's transponder",
    "date": "2009-02-09T00:15:52Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n----- Original Message -----\nFrom: \"Roger Kolakowski\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"Bruce Robertson\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 6:52 PM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] PE1RAH's transponder\n\n\n> We have to remember that William's first transponder has already flown and\n> been proven on India's Amateur Satellite where when it's not in use it\n> stands as a \"spare\" in orbit\n>\n> Roger\n> WA1KAT\n>\n> ----- Original Message -----\n> From: \"Bruce Robertson\" <[email protected]>\n> To: \"AMSAT-BB\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 5:52 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] PE1RAH's transponder\n>\n>\n> > Somewhere in all this discussion about the future of AMSAT we need to\n> > recognize the work that William did on the 10cm^2 U/V transponder that\n> > was featured in the most recent Journal. Here we have a young person\n> > -- by the reckoning of most of us -- taking the very component-based\n> > approach to satellite building that has been seriously suggested as a\n> > way forward. He has made something that will fit the most narrow and\n> > most cheap form in launches today, the cubesat, and the result would\n> > fulfill our interests in analogue communications satellites.\n> >\n> > I suppose I see this as something of a challenge for our forward\n> > thinking. As a group, how do we respond to this? I would like to see\n> > his work tested on ground, perhaps in more than one locale, perhaps in\n> > an urban environment where it would get lots of traffic. Perhaps his\n> > design could go through some sort of audit so that some of our\n> > technical team could ensure that the most performance is being derived\n> > from the least power.\n> >\n> > 73, Bruce\n> > VE9QRP\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n>\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}