Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/W7E737QECLTTRASCBQEPWXIT7EVCJTRQ/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/W7E737QECLTTRASCBQEPWXIT7EVCJTRQ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "W7E737QECLTTRASCBQEPWXIT7EVCJTRQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YWBB6U2ZD3X7YZSFWSMVOO5UN5WZFBD5/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "igalysh (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": "e6ace2e1491949b39e31ee7802fefca8",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e6ace2e1491949b39e31ee7802fefca8/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ivan Galysh",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: OT?? Model Rocketry",
    "date": "2008-03-06T01:05:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YWBB6U2ZD3X7YZSFWSMVOO5UN5WZFBD5/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DBA4ZU2LREPSCOTQZ4L4NVS5KRBFX3CI/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hello,\n\nBeing in high power rocketry, I have used the Maxstream 900 MHz radios  \nwhich are two way. They have the Xtend version that puts out a watt  \nfor several miles of range. There is also Aerocomm modules sold at  \nmouser. Maxstream can be bought from Digikey.  Both are ISM band radios.\n\nI used the Maxstream XCite 4mW 900 MHz radio with a solid link for a 1  \nmile range flight.\n\nNow for doing an uplink to deploy parachutes, maybe as a backup. For  \nsafety reasons, he should use an altimeter. My favorite is made by  \nPerfectflite, the HA45. It can support flights up to 45,000 feet. I  \nwould not rely on a comm link to deploy a parachute. I would do it as  \na back up in case the altimeter doesn't do its job. There have been at  \nleast one past product that allowed you to command the rocket to  \ndelpoy a parachute. I don't think it exists anymore.  With the money  \ninvested in the rocket and electronics plus safety requirements, you  \nneed a reliable parachute deployment system and a radio link is not  \nconsidered reliable.\n\nYou will see that as the rockets get bigger and more expensive, the  \nbuilders include two or more altimeters for improved reliability.\n\nGood luck and use an altimeter for parachute deployment.\n\nIvan\n\n\n\n\n\nOn Mar 5, 2008, at 7:37 PM, RFI-EMI-GUY wrote:\n\n> This may be off topic? I am helping a neighbor who is just getting  \n> into\n> high power model rocketry (Tripoli) He is interested in _two way_\n> telemetry with his rocket and wants the downlink for the usual sensors\n> like altitude, GPS, XYZ-attitude etc. There are _one way_ products  \n> that\n> provide the downlink but he also wants to be able to uplink to fire\n> parachutes or thrusters (during descent). I am leaning toward an 900  \n> MHz\n> ISM solution for the RF but am stumped as to what digital platform  \n> would\n> be most flexible (and light weight) for the communications needs. Are\n> there any standards or better yett off the shelf products? I am open  \n> to\n> suggestions.\n>\n> -- \n> Joe Leikhim K4SAT\n> \"The RFI-EMI-GUY\"©\n>\n> \"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?\n> For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.\"\n>\n> \"Follow The Money\"  ;-P\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}