Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WAO5AD6EWHA5Z3RVLCTQRON5JA4G3IST/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "WAO5AD6EWHA5Z3RVLCTQRON5JA4G3IST",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/H27DR6JA6YCJKOLVNUK563LMYAPTAI5X/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "bbj (a) innismir.net",
        "mailman_id": "0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/0a00322121654998b9a943e3aa653538/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ben Jackson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: OH2AUE P3E transponder demo video",
    "date": "2012-10-16T02:18:13Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CHTSQG2MFSRMTUYMXPCLPDQCBWDWE644/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D2JRCJVN2WY4Y7YNSCDDBYFD2VMOGSD5/",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HKHQ2ESOHF27MMPXTPNMZSWGIDJOYFBQ/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 10/15/2012 8:26 PM, Gus 8P6SM wrote:\n> On 10/15/2012 05:55 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:\n>> I don't agree with these elitist arguments for intentionally making\n>> things difficult.  This \"anti-easy-sat\" mentality doesn't buy us\n>> anything. Let the dead horse decompose.\n>\n> I don't think anybody actually wants to make things deliberately harder.\n>   But hams have always pushed the boundaries.  Going further with less\n> power and less bandwidth.  Fooling around with useless frequencies above\n> 1 MHz.  And so forth.  And the satellite operator is no different.\n>\n> It may be easy to reliably work a future generation of satellites with\n> an HT and a rubber duckie.  But that won't be challenging.  And we (the\n> operators) won't be learning anything new.\n\nBut instead folks are promoting an anachronism. They're discussing \nlearning something new at the same time saying we should be using a \ntechnology that has been in use since the 1960s.\n\nSo then instead of focusing on linear transponders how about deploying \nHSMM nodes into space, TDMA, or DMR technology? (No idea how feasible \nany of of this is)\n\nHow about something that supports TCP/IP? People were discussing how a \nAMSAT could generate interest in a kickstarter for a HEO? Promise a \nbunch of hackers and geeks that with a small donation, sitting for a ham \nradio test, and buying some kind of kit, they can get a (slow) network \nconnection in far flung locations I'm feel fairly confident that they \nwould start hurling their wallets at you screaming \"Shut up and take my \nmoney!\"\n\nHowever, the SSB mafia is firmly entrenched in their ways and will \nsimultaneously bemoan the easy sats, yet pooh-pooh \"hard sats\" that \nwon't support the divine mode.\n\n-- \nBen Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA\nbbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/\n",
    "attachments": []
}