Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WDNCZWBXGI6I7AZCS562HZ3REOBL2IYU/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WDNCZWBXGI6I7AZCS562HZ3REOBL2IYU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "9c6f2aa5-e612-438e-bae2-afbcdf6b73f1@Spark",
    "message_id_hash": "WDNCZWBXGI6I7AZCS562HZ3REOBL2IYU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EM6FNOIEQI7D5M6FR7MMYJKXEB2CDVHH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "brad.wf7t (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "30aea8cbc9994a4fb1c24af05c2b99ac",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/30aea8cbc9994a4fb1c24af05c2b99ac/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Brad Brooks",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] SDR radio",
    "date": "2018-01-10T23:09:18Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/76C2AGSEG5MOHIDRDIJG2RQX6E2SB3CS/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Yes Patrick, To clarify I have used both the DXPatrol and FCDPro+ but in RX duties only thus far. I am configuring a tracking panadapter on my RX side, so I will look for degradation when TXing. My progress/experiments have been delayed due to flu and weather.\n\nI find the DXPatrol to be better performing than a generic RTL dongle, of which I have several. Even the FCDPro+ suffers from front-end overload in my location unless I use an FM BCB filter in front.\n\nI also intend to use a duplexer unit in front of the SDR if 2M overload is experienced.\n\nI will keep posted if there is interest. 73 Brad WF7T\n\n\nOn Jan 10, 2018, 4:56 PM -0600, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) <[email protected]>, wrote:\n> Hi Brad!\n>\n> Have you used the DXPatrol receiver for working amateur\n> satellites? I haven't worked anyone who has used it for the\n> downlink side of their station, nor have I tried one, so\n> I didn't list it in my earlier message. Besides the FUNcube\n> Dongle Pro+ and various SDRplay receivers I mentioned in\n> my earlier e-mail, I have also tried some of the RTL dongles\n> in my satellite station. They were no good - no front-end\n> filtering, and they stopped receiving whenever I transmitted\n> with an HT or FT-817 on a different band than where I was\n> receiving. That's why I first went with a FUNcube dongle,\n> and later on the SDRplay units.\n>\n> I went to the DXPatrol web site and downloaded its PDF\n> manual. It looks like an RTL dongle with an upconverter\n> for its coverage below 25 MHz. Its price is a little less\n> than the SDRplay RSP1A sold by HRO.\n>\n> 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> Twitter: @WD9EWK or http://twitter.com/WD9EWK\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Brad Brooks <[email protected]> wrote:\n> > > Also, the DXPatrol Mk4 is an option. It is designed by CT1FFU and available in US from Vibroplex. 73 Brad WF7T\n> > >\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}