Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WJTQ2F7M5JFFJSIHWWZSAHM37DHBPKYU/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "WJTQ2F7M5JFFJSIHWWZSAHM37DHBPKYU",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EN5KDOL5DSD755FZXGLNZG7UWG7F4QSF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rogerkola (a) aol.com",
        "mailman_id": "8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/8323dbe496014835b5bd2be9b5ff6f66/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Roger",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Old Oscar Sub Band 144.300-144.500",
    "date": "2011-09-30T22:41:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EN5KDOL5DSD755FZXGLNZG7UWG7F4QSF/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/D6V27VEOJRXFMPIPUIWKCEZ4F33PZ6GQ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Google would seem to indicate that the best solution would be to use the \nrules outlined by your local 2 meter coordinating committee...in \nreality, those frequencies are not currently published as in use by any \namateur satellites.\n\nRoger\nWA1KAT\n\nOn 9/30/2011 5:45 PM, ka9qjg wrote:\n>\n>\n> Hello hope Everyone is doing Well I \"am not sure this Post went out or not\n> If Someone  has a Answer  if You like Just E-Mail Me Direct at\n> [email protected]\n>\n>\n>\n> THANKS IN Advance\n>\n> 73 De Don KA9QJG\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Hello From Don KA9QJG   , Hope Everyone is doing Well I have Heard and Read\n> and ask a lot of Questions about Hams using the Oscar Sub Band 144.3-144.5\n> and as You can guess I Got a lot of Opinions From the ARRL, FCC   And\n> others, So I thought the Best thing to go was to actually get the Answers\n> from You the users.\n>\n> Yes I know that  and as a Responsible Ham I think We all should use the\n> Guidelines , But in this Case  From what I have found the Oscar Sats have\n> not been on the Air since in Many Years ,  and NO Other Sats or ISS Is using\n> the Freqs or set aside for them ,  So  a Lot of Hams in the US are using the\n> Freqs for  FM/ SSB  CW  DIGTAL  And Look the Well Established APRS 144.39\n>\n>\n>\n> And long time and still used 144.34 FM for Conducting ATV   And I have seen\n> on the Internet Some States actually adding the 144.300-144.5 As Simplex FM\n>\n>\n>\n> The Problem is I have Heard People Jamming and Arguments about this over the\n> Air   , I have even seen on the Internet when doing searches for Info Some\n> States even include this NON Used 144.300  TO 144.500 For  FM Simplex Etc..\n> Because NO Oscar Sats Exist or Nothing else to Interfere with But I agree\n> 100Percent if there Was  the Freqs should NOT Be used for anything other\n> then what it was intended for\n>\n>\n>\n> Thanks 73\n>\n>\n>\n> De Don KA9QJG\n>\n>\n>\n> PS as You know We have a lot of older Hams kind of set in their ways and the\n> New ones Are Listening and looking for ways to Fit in, and We need as Many\n> New Responsible Hams in this Hobby as We can get But How Could We get on\n> these Freqs Some are using and Say Hey We are not allowed here Because of\n> the Oscar Sub Band Something that has been Gone for over 20 Yrs\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}