Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WNVTJC4H7ST3ECZ7ULNUN6QRPUV2FWQY/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "WNVTJC4H7ST3ECZ7ULNUN6QRPUV2FWQY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WNVTJC4H7ST3ECZ7ULNUN6QRPUV2FWQY/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "steven_a (a) rogers.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Steve Attfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  tight pattern on 432",
    "date": "2007-06-14T21:05:05Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have a friend who does a bit of RDF on 432. a bit of background is \nthat he's an amateur rocket enthusiast and he has a 432 beacon mounted \ninside the rocket which he uses to retrieve the rocket. He's currently \nusing a 6 element beam to do this and we were wondering about finding \nhim an antenna with a tighter pattern. he's cosidering going for a 10 \nelement yagi but I think that may be a bit bigger then what he would \nwant to lug around.\n-Steve VA3SAX\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}