Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WPGBDHXZDOPZEPCSZRDJRBP56MEHKZXB/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "WPGBDHXZDOPZEPCSZRDJRBP56MEHKZXB",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WPGBDHXZDOPZEPCSZRDJRBP56MEHKZXB/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k6yk (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "John W Lee",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]   Re: apparent beacon on 435.300",
    "date": "2008-08-31T18:08:29Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nI copied pretty much all the telemetry from that RS-30 one day, \nit had a pretty good signal all right!  Just up a few KC from \nAO-51 downlink. Maybe  435.312 and doppler down to 435.309.\n\n73\nJohn K6YK\n\n--------- Forwarded message ----------\nFrom: \"Andrew Glasbrenner\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"Michael Heim\" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>\nDate: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:47:18 -0400\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: apparent beacon on 435.300\nMessage-ID: <9613C898F07A4BF48BB9E7E1ED3FAC96@andrewlaptop>\nReferences: <[email protected]>\n \nIt's RS-30, aka Yubileiny, on 435.315 and 435.215. Apparently there are\nno \ntwo-way packages onboard, unfortunately. It's also unfortunate that the \nbuilders didn't coordinate their downlinks with the IARU, and they ended\nup \nso close to the AO-51 downlink.\n \n73, Drew KO4MA\n \n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Michael Heim\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 8:25 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] apparent beacon on 435.300\n \n \n> I've heard a CW beacon a couple of times operating on or around\n435.300. \n> Unfortunately I dont have exact times from my QTH, but I cant find \n> anything in the satellite list on AMSAT's site that has a working\nbeacon \n> on this frequency (or anywhere close).  I heard it about 23:45Z,\nbreaking \n> the squelch (on FM) while waiting for the next AO-51 pass.  This will\nput \n> it about 10-15 mins before AOS for AO-51 from my QTH in EN90rw.  Pardon\nme \n> if there is an obvious answer to this, but I'm not familiar with all\nthe \n> ham birds up there yet.\n>\n> Just trying to figure out what I could be hearing?  This is not the\nfirst \n> time I've heard CW on this freq.\n>\n> Michael Heim\n> ARS KD0AR\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the\nauthor.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n \n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n \n____________________________________________________________\nClick here for great computer networking solutions!\nhttp://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oHgMSC4PZH2j5VnhYTqaO6MfOOiG7p4aBpKuSQ01MCwr7WN/\n",
    "attachments": []
}