Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WT6YPR2CRCUND5SDDHDCGSWUAJEGAYMQ/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WT6YPR2CRCUND5SDDHDCGSWUAJEGAYMQ/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "WT6YPR2CRCUND5SDDHDCGSWUAJEGAYMQ", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WT6YPR2CRCUND5SDDHDCGSWUAJEGAYMQ/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "Richard (a) g3rwl.demon.co.uk", "mailman_id": "3415b4a135da4375b8e385a8b78acc30", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/3415b4a135da4375b8e385a8b78acc30/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Richard Limebear", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Performance of IC-471?", "date": "2007-12-03T10:14:15Z", "parent": null, "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "KC4YLV wrote:\n\n > The reason I'm drawn to the 471 are its single band construction with \nrobust filtering, I already have a mint 271a and think the 471 would \nmatch well. Can anybody comment as to the suitability and/or performance \nof the ol' 471 on satellite?\n\nExcellent satellite rig; I still use one. One mod I did was to replace \nthe front-end device. The rig comes with a 3SK48 but I replaced this \nwith a BF981; its a straight drop-in replacement and needs no \nre-alignment. Its Q10 on the RF-YGR board. Ticklish to make sure you \nhave the replacement device the right way round though; email me direct \nif you want deeper instructions. Claimed to give a 10dB gain improvement \nwith a noise figure reduction of about 2.5dB overall. Only thing is I'm \nnot sure if this device is still available (I did the mod in 1993).\n\n-- \n73\nRichard W L Limebear G3RWL\[email protected]\nFOC # 1188\n\n So many beautiful girls ... (sob) so little time\n", "attachments": [] }