Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/X42FWQK2UZYGPQQ774WKKMW2K5DIEN73/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/X42FWQK2UZYGPQQ774WKKMW2K5DIEN73/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "X42FWQK2UZYGPQQ774WKKMW2K5DIEN73", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2WRDRX6OYQ2A4NO2PXNKYLNA2TUZECFS/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com", "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "w4upd", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 milliwatt CW", "date": "2009-06-04T01:35:18Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2WRDRX6OYQ2A4NO2PXNKYLNA2TUZECFS/?format=api", "children": [ "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/WP5LZGRPCFSTUGG4ZPE4X4EKBBYQKHZ6/?format=api" ], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "I can't figure out what's wrong here. I listen for AO-7 on the past your \nwere talking about and was not able to here it at all and it went as \nhigh as 89 degrees here. I thought maybe the pass times were off but \nlisten well before and after the times and still did not here it. \nHowever, I hear all of the other satellites at the appropriate times. \nWas AO-7 in A or B mode? Usually I hear AO-7 horizon to horizon (except \ndirectly overhead) with a Ringer II vertical. I'm missing something \nhere. I enjoy working AO-7 now I seem not to be able to hear it.\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\n\n\[email protected] wrote:\n> Hey everyone,\n>\n> I worked the AO-7 pass just after 00:00 UTC here because it had a maximum elevation for me of almost 89 degrees. I wanted to see how much, if any, my ability to work would expand when runninng a half-watt if a used CW instead of SSB. \n>\n> On this pass, at least, I had a copyable signal from 30 degrees to 30 degrees, and made a partial contact at 00:15 UTC with a station whose call sign I did not fully copy - which is totally my fault. The call was WA4 (or, at least, that's what I copied), but I didn't catch the suffix. The signal faded slightly, and I didn't ask for a repeat. That's embarrassing, and I apologize to the operator for that. When he called me, AO-7 was below 35 degrees. I reported a 589 to him, and he gave me a 559, which exceeded my expectations. When we finished the QSO, AO-7 was at 28 degrees elevation to my location, and I faded into the noise.\n>\n> It'll take a few more passes, at least, to say with some measure of certainty, but it appears that, for my station, I probably can expect to have workable signals at a half-watt out on AO-7 at 50 degrees elevation and above in SSB, and at 30 degrees elevation and above in CW. Given the compromises I choose to have with a fully portable station, that's not to bad for milliwatts.\n>\n> 73 to all,\n>\n> Tim - N3TL\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n>\n> No virus found in this incoming message.\n> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com \n> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.52/2153 - Release Date: 06/03/09 18:00:00\n>\n> \n\n", "attachments": [] }