Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XA47VMUKHN7SR77AWOLSZFAMPVP4KEFK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAFhiEUHMm-kNGGfXQTz2Zv=KiZWudFDSVOZydd_Vb+jQX+GH6w@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "XA47VMUKHN7SR77AWOLSZFAMPVP4KEFK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6SYSOL7235L2XQBBX2TW3DEIFYVSRCSC/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka2rvo (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "9f17571ba68843a5a016b38d8900ffb1",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9f17571ba68843a5a016b38d8900ffb1/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "James Austin",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Review of HTs for sat use",
    "date": "2016-09-22T01:46:07Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FIL3W7JCLZQDRIYN2UJEI5VR4JRWCTKQ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PEQA5NMI7FTVNWMVH27LBTLEKETB6WPB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "What was the problem with the Chinese HT's working full duplex in the V/U\nmodes. I don't recall that being mentioned in the article.\n\nJim/KA2RVO\n\nOn Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) <\[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Rick,\n>\n> I didn't review *all* HTs that would work for satellite communication,\n> but did talk about 4 of the Chinese-made dual-band HTs that could\n> work AO-85 (and the other upcoming Fox-1 U/V FM satellites)\n> full-duplex, with varying levels of success. That article appeared in\n> the March/April 2016 issue of the AMSAT Journal. If you missed that\n> issue, you can see my article in a PDF at:\n>\n> http://dropbox.wd9ewk.net/\n>\n> Look in the Articles folder, and go to the last article in that\n> folder (file name starts with \"Working_AO85\").\n>\n> As with other HTs or low-power stations, you will find more success\n> working higher AO-85 passes, and not necessarily trying to work those\n> higher passes near AOS or LOS. With that in mind, I'm regularly\n> working AO-85 full-duplex with a Wouxun KG-UV9D and Elk log periodic\n> either in my back yard or in my driveway. I make my contacts when\n> the satellite is up at least 20 to 25 degrees above the horizon.\n>\n> Other than that, the situation with HTs and satellites is still the\n> same as before. Only one HT in current production - Kenwood TH-D72A -\n> will work all V/U and U/V FM satellites full-duplex. There are many\n> older HTs that have been out of production a long time that will\n> do that. The 4 Chinese-made HTs I mention in the article are able to\n> work AO-85 and other U/V FM satellites full-duplex, but not the\n> V/U satellites like SO-50 or LilacSat-2.\n>\n> If you need more information beyond that article, please feel free\n> to e-mail me directly. Good luck, and 73!\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\n> http://www.wd9ewk.net/\n> Twitter: @WD9EWK\n>\n>\n>\n> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Richard Lawn <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> > Do any of you recall where in the last 6 months or so there was an\n> article\n> > by a ham who reviewed all of the current HTs, especially the cheap ones,\n> > for use for satellite communication? I know I'm not dreaming this and I'm\n> > soon to do a presentation for our local club and wanted to refer to this\n> > article and recommendations. Hopefully one of you can jog my ever fading\n> > memory.\n> > Rick, W2JAZ\n> >\n> >\n> > --\n> > Sent from Gmail Mobile\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}