Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XAK75MVGWDQBZIBQGM4WSWJ6QDL7PDDI/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "XAK75MVGWDQBZIBQGM4WSWJ6QDL7PDDI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/R5A74XCPKHEHGLBDRJOKR6MIEXPP6KDA/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kk5do (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Bruce",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)",
    "date": "2018-06-25T21:13:59Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3N2EAKMJ3QR43V7BDGAJK2YLLXTDT7S2/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UY4ZJ56SR7XII6QIFBA7OL6SMFE2ONJZ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "A net control type op is perfectly acceptable. Only thing is they can only score 1 FM contact per FM satellite.  If they wish to work every SO-50 pass and work every station, they can do it. What ever works.  It is easier to have an ht and Arrow on field day rather than an all mode radio. That is why the FM sats are so busy. The rules are there to try and get more to operate SSB/CW instead of FM.  \n\n73...bruce\n\nSent from my iPhone\n\nOn Jun 25, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Matthew Stevens <[email protected]> wrote:\n\nThe first AO91 pass after start time on saturday, I just listened to\nN5AT (op KG5CCI) doing an awesome job as what you have called the \"net\ncontrol\" station. I have a feeling half the people on the pass\nwouldn't have made a qso at all if it hadn't been for Dave calling\nthem amid all the \"CQ field day\" and callsign-dropping, keying down,\nand aprs packets (why? Who knows lol). And Dave was operating the same\nas I did this weekend, a handheld antenna and manually tuned rig.\n\nI have mixed feelings about the one-Q FM sat rule - it makes sense in\na way, but in my experience one competent, experienced op (keyword\nthere is competent..) on the FM sats can make a lot of FM-only HT ops\nvery very happy, scoring them their 100 point bonus they promised for\ntheir clubs! I guess the rule does (hopefully) prevent the\nuber-stations from tying up the pass working each other to pad scores,\nbut it doesn't do anything about the massive QRM that always seems to\nhappen on FM. I'm glad to hear a few guys on there who are worried\nless about their own scores, and more about handing out contacts to\nthose that really need them on Field Day.\n\nI pretty much just hung out on linears this year, operating for about\nan hour and a half total on sats while waiting for 6m to open.It was a\nlot of fun, and by and large I thought most everyone I heard was doing\na great job. There was only a few stations that never seemed to hear\nwhen they were called. Overall, good job to all the amsat ops, and I'm\nlooking forward to next year!\n\n73,\n\n- Matthew nj4y\n\n\nOn Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\n<[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hi Bruce!\n> \n> Based on the passes I heard and worked, if there was a\n> station strong enough to get through and complete QSOs,\n> others hoped that station would stick around and make\n> more QSOs. Otherwise, why would anyone call a station\n> just after that station completed a QSO? That was the\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}