Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XCH4DEBMO7FBN3GY4ZE7X67YAAGKTSGI/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "XCH4DEBMO7FBN3GY4ZE7X67YAAGKTSGI",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TGH2J5FMGDPG27N4ZFF2OPOWLKEGM7CS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "thomasmschaefer (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Thomas Schaefer",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: HB9DRV",
    "date": "2011-09-29T13:06:03Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZEZPZ6LKZCLUO5CTX2GLHYRDXGHZ65N5/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Well I can at least guarantee the 9100 and 821 would work as I would fix it. HRD has the nicest interface for the sat program. It just needs to be finished\n\nPrincipal Solutions Architect\nBetter Software Solutions, Inc.\n727.437.2771\n\nOn Sep 29, 2011, at 7:26 AM, \"Gary \\\"Joe\\\" Mayfield\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> What's so wrong with Simon making a buck as the result of his hard work???\n> \n> 73,\n> Joe kk0sd\n> \n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n> Behalf Of Ben Jackson\n> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:47 PM\n> To: Thomas Schaefer\n> Cc: <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HB9DRV\n> \n> On 9/28/2011 10:52 AM, Thomas Schaefer wrote:\n>> I have to say the statement about people not having the experience,\n>> time and patience to maintain it is pure egotistical nonsense.\n> \n> *snip*\n> \n>> Open source code is always better because no matter how clever ones\n>> thinks they are as a programmer, there are always better coders.\n> \n> DING DING DING! I think you nailed the issue on the head. No one wants \n> to admit that their code could be horrid. However, when opening your \n> code, you are running the risk of someone coming up and saying \"Hey, \n> this is horrid, I rewrote it so it's ten times better.\" -- Plus there's \n> the whole commenting, documentation, etc. That's at least doubling the \n> workload.\n> \n> I open source my software. Why? Because I /know/ my code is horrid. \n> Nowhere to go but up.\n> \n>> If HRD was open sourced, I guarantee the satellite tracking piece\n>> would work perfectly for all radios because we would have fixed it.\n> \n> However, that's a big statement to make. Getting an active development \n> community around you codebase is a bit difficult. There is no way to \n> guarantee such things.\n> \n> -- \n> Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA\n> bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}