Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XV6CAZL7SVA7OI33MI2BSV4ARIOYHQWC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "XV6CAZL7SVA7OI33MI2BSV4ARIOYHQWC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6DJ6C2HN3YSONKUA5KDD5ANEVSGA37BH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kenneth.g.ransom (a) nasa.gov",
        "mailman_id": "7a18787420f848ee95993e164e807c2c",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/7a18787420f848ee95993e164e807c2c/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Very much appreciated.",
    "date": "2008-03-10T01:21:49Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6DJ6C2HN3YSONKUA5KDD5ANEVSGA37BH/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Why does not seeing ISS rule out PCSAT?  Are you confusing PCSAT with PCSAT2 that flew on the ISS as a payload?\nPCSAT (NO-44) is in a near polar orbit. It has much higher (latitude) coverage than ISS.\n \nKenneth - N5VHO\n\n________________________________\n\nFrom: [email protected] on behalf of John Hackett\nSent: Sun 3/9/2008 6:07 PM\nTo: Drew\nCc: [email protected]; [email protected]\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Very much appreciated.\n\n\n\n\nDrew,\n           Thanks for your prompt answer to my queries.\n\nThat's precisely why I asked ... so as not get get up anyone's nose.\n\nActually, I can't work PSCAT or GO-32.\n\nAs I mentioned, I'm totally blocked by mountains for the ISS  (so that rules out PCSAT too) at 1200bps and the IC-E91 would be impossible !! to modify for 9600bps operation, even though MixW would generate it. I believe one needs to \"go in\" somewhere near the varactor nodulator for 9600bps and for an IC-E91 that would entail micro-surgery ... when ICOM say \"low speed digital communications\" I believe they mean about 25 bps a day! into the data connector.\n\nI find I can't get into AO-51 (portable) with low power and an Arrow aerial due to the alligators - people calling a station that is actually still speaking ... (on FM !!) ... is typical of the AO-51 operating I've been monitoring ... in other words, sending all the wrong signals to the potential newcomer.\n\nThere have been \"reams\" written on this subject but the age-old technique of an inadequate receive system ensures the punter turns up the wick to compensate - and cocks it up for everybody  ... seems to be the order of the day on AO-51.\n\nThanks anyway Drew - guess I'll just have to take up stamp collecting instead.\n\n73 John.   <[email protected]>\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}