Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XXYLQ5VWMFGS7DUNAITXW4B4K23EK3CG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "XXYLQ5VWMFGS7DUNAITXW4B4K23EK3CG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/XXYLQ5VWMFGS7DUNAITXW4B4K23EK3CG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "jmario (a) fast.net",
        "mailman_id": "ceceaad95b554cb2b6933fdf204ec473",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/ceceaad95b554cb2b6933fdf204ec473/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Joe Cassano aka jmario",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LUSAT Silent in AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 565",
    "date": "2009-10-23T21:07:59Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nI guess I'm not the only one who uses LO-19 as a test signal...\n\n>   12.  LUSAT silent (Mike Rupprecht)\n>   13.  Handy Sat predictor (Pedro Converso)\n>   14. Re: LuSat Silent (John Marranca, Jr)\n>   15. Re: LuSat Silent (David - KG4ZLB)\n>   16. Re: LuSat Silent (Mike Rupprecht)\n\nI was listening during a 65 degree elevation rising pass over the NE \nU.S. on October 22 between 16:15 and 16:30 EDT and heard nothing.  I was \n  tuned to 437.125 and have an SDR-14 connected to the receiver IF. \nDuring the pass the SDR-14 was set to display a +/- 20khz window and \nnothing was seen.  I replayed the pass recording and looked at it with \nthe SDR-14's widest window (+/- 95khz) and still saw nothing.\n\nLooks like LO-19 may have joined my other favorite ham-sat, GO-32 in \ngoing silent.\n\nJoeC\nK3FMA\n",
    "attachments": []
}