Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Y3BRDWV4LRI2F27S4LQIUTIAYHXVDIZN/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAAJiE8MOGb1kUOjkkZrJ_zcXW1m8scT=wFM=qKWvVzyR+19fMw@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "Y3BRDWV4LRI2F27S4LQIUTIAYHXVDIZN",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GR5HKBO4LTEP36WTRBBE7CH3UGW3V6CF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb2ysi (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Don KB2YSI",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Radio selection: FT-818 vs IC-7100",
    "date": "2018-08-30T21:42:56Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZCYL66HMFMNDEMPWY3Y3VSJYAZ5YPTUN/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LHRB4AXYQ5BW2RFLCTEUHG252BV34C25/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "While I own an IC7100 and am working on the setup to use it in the field\nwith transponder satellites. I will say it is not really the best setup\nwhen compared to an 817/818. Not to mention the weight of the radio alone\nmuch less than including a battery too.\n\n73, Don KB2YSI\n\nOn Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 14:33 Dave . <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> I've had a 7100 for about four years now and love it. The menus are easy to\n> use and it has DSTAR which I enjoy. I'm just getting it setup with a\n> SDRPlay as a RX to use it for portable satellite operation. I used it as my\n> base for a few years and then bought a 9100. Now it's my primary\n> mobile/portable radio.  MTC has them on sale for labor day, after rebate\n> $779.00\n>\n> https://www.mtcradio.com/icom-ic-7100-160-10-meters-6m-2m-440-mhz-12-vdc-w-dstar-779-after-mir-sale/\n>\n>\n>\n> Dave\n> N2OA\n>\n> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:29 AM Daniel Holmes <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n>\n> > Hi everyone, time for another “what radio is right for me” thread. I\n> > haven’t seen one compare these two: IC-7100 and an FT-818. Primarily\n> > looking at satellite work, but I’m also interested in HF digital\n> (primarily\n> > FT8). I’ve already got an Arrow antenna, and a potatoFeng. Right now I\n> use\n> > an SDR to receive, and CubicSDR works pretty well for that-I’ve gotten\n> > adept at moving the tuning while using the Armstrong method of Alt/Az\n> > locating. I haven’t tried transmitting, just because my HT has pretty\n> poor\n> > transmit characteristics. So I feel I’m pretty good on the full duplex\n> > issue.\n> >\n> > Cost isn’t an issue, with the current rebate on the IC-7100 they are\n> close\n> > enough to not matter. And the accessories needed will balance out (for\n> the\n> > Icom, tuner and power supply, for the Yaesu, tuner, and signalink-I have\n> an\n> > adequate power supply).\n> >\n> > For the short term (6 months or so) most of my satellite operating is\n> > going to be from a card table in the back yard, or portable. HF will be a\n> > little more permanent, so each radio will have to be disconnected, moved,\n> > and setup again for satellite stuff. That’s the paralysis—the FT will\n> > probably be easier to move, but the IC is more sensitive.\n> >\n> > So I think my criteria is coming down to ergonomics of operating vs\n> > sensitivity and HF power. I use MacDoppler for tracking, and will\n> probably\n> > rely on it for downlink shift on the radios, with my SDR as backup. Oh, I\n> > already do QRP CW on 20, so I’m not too nervous about power of the 818.\n> >\n> > Thanks,\n> > Dan\n> >\n> > Sent from my iPad. Fewer misspellings, more errors.\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}