Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Y3JPKYHXUIWZCUJ4AZBHRWUCTHTJBNZO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "Y3JPKYHXUIWZCUJ4AZBHRWUCTHTJBNZO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YBFNYKGXREG34DIKUN4EEWFNF7PRQYHD/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kg4zlb (a) googlemail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "KG4ZLB",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 L/S?",
    "date": "2009-10-04T19:03:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4N6PJHW5ZJAZ5LUFKYYNNJEBW5BEZETL/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YVAV2A6A4V62JY75AMBU6T2HXJFAR6XG/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Remember \"experimenters Wednesday's\" ?\n\nI would vote for some sort of return of that if possible.\n\nDavid KG4ZLB\n\nSent from my iPod\n\nOn 4 Oct 2009, at 14:27, \"Alan VE4YZ\" <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Bob, I second that!  Right now I'm trying to locally sell my 2 K5GNA\n> downconverters and seriously considering getting rid of a FT736r  \n> with the\n> 1.2GHZ module because of the inactivity.  My FT847 is all that gets  \n> used.\n> The last local flea market this year is 2 weekends from now and then  \n> I have\n> to think about doing an eBay.\n>\n> A 3 or 4 day session on L/S, U/S or V/S once a month allows for\n> experimenting and tweaking in addition to trying to work 1 or 2 of  \n> those\n> days into your other commitments.\n>\n> Thank goodness for baby monitors and older cordless phones so that I  \n> can\n> periodically scan the horizon to check out the K5GNA's :-)\n>\n> ... Alan\n>\n>\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]  \n> On\n> Behalf Of Bob- W7LRD\n> Sent: October 4, 2009 1:03 PM\n> To: [email protected]; [email protected]\n> Cc: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51 L/S?\n>\n>\n>\n> Hello Gents\n>\n> I would like to request a \"somewhat\" consistent L and / or  S mode\n> availability on AO- 51.  A recent post by John-K8YSE correctly  \n> explained\n> that long term L/S availability is almost counter productive.  If we  \n> define\n> that by the number of operators to pass ratio.  There are a few of  \n> us L/S\n> holdouts mostly from AO-40 (sobsob).  If we could plan that for say  \n> three\n> days (or whatever) at a given date we can expect those modes, and be  \n> ready.\n>   Right now it appears to be a month to month variable decision with  \n> nothing\n> definitive.  If there were more availabilty and chit-chat about L/S  \n> modes it\n> might inspire others to try it.   AO-51 is the only testbed for  \n> varied L/S\n> modes.  The only way I have for \"tweeking\" my S band gear is to put  \n> a -35Dbm\n> signal source at the end of my driveway and tweeking    my equipment  \n> and\n> antennas.  Real world evaluation is always the proof of success.\n>\n> 73 Bob W7LRD\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}