Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Y57J2SSTTUYU6DUKVQBVXA4FHSUAPU5D/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAN6TEUfjTQGvqhDnMoEfxa5ehFKzfDxXOrjV6RAuhM4WZNY0bQ@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "Y57J2SSTTUYU6DUKVQBVXA4FHSUAPU5D",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/Q6RUFOSYPBOWVDYZ3FTZZBMPYI3GI6ZW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite QSO's and LoTW",
    "date": "2011-10-27T15:29:12Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q6RUFOSYPBOWVDYZ3FTZZBMPYI3GI6ZW/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/V6HQICVRUF73BLSYSKTKUBUC6PW7LTEZ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Jeff!\n\n> I was curious what the standard was for Logbook of the World (LoTW)\n> reporting. Which band do you log your QSO with, Uplink or Downlink?\n\nThe standard should be what is shown in N5JB's helpful PDF\nfor satellite operators using LoTW.  It is available from the\nARRL web site:\n\nhttp://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf\n\nThe BAND field should be the uplink band.  The FREQ field is\nnot mandatory for LoTW, but it can also be uploaded to show\nthe uplink frequency you used.\n\n> I've been seeing mix results coming back via LoTW, where HRD Log defaults to\n> using the downlink frequency although I've had some QSO's report back using\n> the uplink. I do also log the satellite, mode and propagation type.\n\nThe PROP_MODE and SAT_NAME fields must be present for a\nQSO to be a satellite QSO in LoTW.  Make sure the satellite\nname matches with the list at the bottom of the LoTW FAQ page:\n\nhttps://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq\n\nOtherwise, LoTW may try to match that up as a non-satellite QSO.\nAgain, N5JB's document does a great job of explaining things\nrelated to satellite operators using LoTW.\n\nWhen I made my first uploads to LoTW earlier this year, I only\nuploaded the seven fields as listed on the top of page two in\nN5JB's PDF.  I had several thousand satellite QSOs I wanted\nto upload, along with the setup in TQSL for dozens of station\nlocations and getting all the certificates for my call signs.\nOnce the initial setup was done, and I had those QSOs in the\nsystem, it has been easy to keep up with the uploads for\nsubsequent activity.  I now include the 3 optional fields (uplink\nfrequency, downlink band and frequency) in my LoTW uploads\nto have a more-complete QSO record - even though those\nadditional fields have no effect on what becomes a QSL in LoTW.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n",
    "attachments": []
}