Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YBBRWSHGTEWN2HBJMS6TOVI2EZXU72FF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "YBBRWSHGTEWN2HBJMS6TOVI2EZXU72FF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YBBRWSHGTEWN2HBJMS6TOVI2EZXU72FF/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k6yk (a) juno.com",
        "mailman_id": "9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9dd495eb5a5b4400ad5e4ad998068d9f/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "k6yk",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: FD Mess",
    "date": "2011-06-27T21:01:46Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/UUEB4UW2F3SML6ZISZHMCE7FQAYXGMTU/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": " \nFD is a mess every year. No matter what bird(s) you try. \n\nMost of the FD stations have no clue about satellites, they just get \nthe idea they need to make 1 satellite contact or as many as they can. \nThey don't know about all the rules particular to AMSAT, and they \ndont' care. \n\nThey ask somebody what frequency to transmit and listen on and then\nthey get their 500 watt amp, big beam or no beam, no preamp, and \nstart calling and calling. They don't hear anything so they just mess up\nthe\nwhole works.  Happens every year. \n\nYou either have to bear with it and make your one contact or give up.\n\n73, \nK6YK\n\n\nOn Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:33:34 +0100 Gordon JC Pearce <[email protected]>\nwrites:\n> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:48:48 -0500\n> Patrick Green <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> > The ARRL should impose an ERP limit for satellite contacts.  That\n> > would solve the problem.  I don't see how running amplifiers on FD \n> is\n> > in the spirit of what FD is all about.  I've made contacts using \n> 50 mw\n> > so why do stations use 100+ watts *before* the antenna..  I \n> wouldn't\n> > want my kids playing around a FD site with this time of setup.\n> \n> Wouldn't that be AMSAT's job?  It's certainly possible to work an FM \n> bird with 5W from a handie, and a hand-held yagi.\n> \n> I don't understand the obsession with having all-singing-all-dancing \n> computer-controlled setups, where it automatically updates its \n> orbital elements, automatically calculates when the next pass is, \n> automatically calculates where to steer the aerial and what to tune \n> the radio to and leaving the operator to just push the PTT and shout \n> over the top of the QRP/P stations.\n> \n> All the computer-controlled stuff just plain isn't amateur radio.  \n> If you want to sit in front of a computer and talk to people, use \n> Skype.\n> \n> Gordon MM0YEQ\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n \n____________________________________________________________\nGroupon&#8482 Official Site\n1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city&#39;s best!\nhttp://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4e08f240241f6c2ab4st04vuc\n",
    "attachments": []
}