Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YGKE4Y7TAFHDBWB6W7UTY4JVXWHGAV4A/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "YGKE4Y7TAFHDBWB6W7UTY4JVXWHGAV4A",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/YGKE4Y7TAFHDBWB6W7UTY4JVXWHGAV4A/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "K3IO (a) verizon.net",
        "mailman_id": "79a9b3ddaa4b44baae47f92374974ac4",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/79a9b3ddaa4b44baae47f92374974ac4/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom Clark, K3IO",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle",
    "date": "2007-12-16T16:23:14Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "In a private note, Ed (KL7UW) pointed out that his gain numbers had\nassumed an aperture efficiency of 55%. Given this ~-3 dB value for the\nlosses, his \"gain\" and my \"directivity\" values (as contained in the\nAMSAT Symposium paper I referenced) are in agreement. Thanks to Ed for\nexplaining his assumptions.\n\n73, Tom\n",
    "attachments": []
}